Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104376›Full record

SynthesisPsychological bulletin2021

A quantitative meta-analysis of face recognition deficits in autism: 40 years of research.

Jason W Griffin, Russell Bauer, K Suzanne Scherf

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason W GriffinDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-0124
Russell BauerDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-6027
K Suzanne ScherfDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-6362

Funding

Using Serious Game Technology to Improve Sensitivity to Eye Gaze in AutismR33MH110624 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SCHERF, KATHRYN SUZANNE · 2018 to 2020
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R33 MH110624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to recognize an individual face is essential to human social interaction. Even subtle errors in this process can have huge implications for the way we relate to social partners. Because autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by deficits in social interaction, researchers have theorized about the potential role of atypical face identity processing to the symptom profile of ASD for more than 40 years. We conducted an empirical meta-analysis of this large literature to determine whether and to what extent face identity processing is atypical in ASD compared to typically developing (TD) individuals. We also tested the hypotheses that the deficit is selective to face identity recognition, not perception, and that methodological variation across studies moderates the magnitude of the estimated deficit. We identified 112 studies (5,390 participants) that generated 172 effect sizes from both recognition (

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalFacial RecognitionRecognition, PsychologyAutism Spectrum DisorderHumansResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID33104376
PMCPMC8961473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.