Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104374›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental psychology2020

Measurement models for studying child executive functioning: Questioning the status quo.

Marie Camerota, Michael T Willoughby, Clancy B Blair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie CamerotaRTI International.ORCID 0000-0001-8293-6467
Michael T WilloughbyRTI International.ORCID 0000-0002-8470-3533
Clancy B BlairDepartment of Applied Psychology.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-238X

Funding

Temperment, Psychobiological, and Cognitive PredictorsP01HD039667 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BURCHINAL, MARGARET RUTH · 2002 to 2011
$29.1M
Stress, Self-Regulation and Psychopathology in Middle ChildhoodR01HD081252 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BLAIR, CLANCY B · 2015 to 2019
$6.5M
Early Life Stress and the Environmental Origins of Disease: a Population-based Prospective Longitudinal Study of Children in Rural PovertyUG3OD023332 · OD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BLAIR, CLANCY B · 2016 to 2017
$6.5M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Drug AbuseNational Institutes of Health; Office of The DirectorNICHD NIH HHS P01 HD039667NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081252NIH HHS UG3 OD023332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite widespread interest in the construct of executive functioning (EF), we currently lack definitive evidence regarding the best measurement model for representing the construct in substantive analyses. The most common practice is to represent EF ability as a reflective latent variable, with child performance on individual EF tasks as observed indicators. The current article critically evaluates the dominant use of reflective latent variable models in the child EF literature and compares them to composite models, a reasonable alternative. We review the literature suggesting that reflective latent variable models may not be the most appropriate representation of the construct of EF. Using preschool (M

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentExecutive FunctionChildChild, PreschoolEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsSchools

Identifiers

PMID33104374
PMCPMC8284867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.