Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104254›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2020

Organizational integration, practice capabilities, and outcomes in clinically complex medicare beneficiaries.

Carrie Colla, Wendy Yang, Alexander J Mainor, Ellen Meara, Marietou H Ouayogode, Valerie A Lewis, Stephen Shortell, Elliott Fisher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Community Characteristics Associated With Health System Penetration.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Government's 10 year plan for the NHS in England.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Impact of hospital-physician integration on Medicare patient mix.The American journal of managed care · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carrie CollaThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8414-5084
Wendy YangGeisel School of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Alexander J MainorGeisel School of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9854-9365
Ellen MearaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marietou H OuayogodeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4628-0015
Valerie A LewisDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-1240
Stephen ShortellSchool of Public Health, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7392-9801
Elliott FisherGeisel School of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USBerkeley Public Health Division · USHarvard University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
PA-20-072: Accelerating the Use of Evidence-based Innovation in Healthcare SystemsU19HS024075 · AHRQ · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MEARA, ELLEN R. · 2015 to 2021
$19.8M
AHRQ HHS U19 HS024075NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the association between clinical integration and financial integration, quality-focused care delivery processes, and beneficiary utilization and outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Multiphysician practices in the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (response rate 47%) and 2017 Medicare claims data. STUDY

designCross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries attributed to physician practices, focusing on two domains of integration: clinical (coordination of patient services, use of protocols, individual clinician measures, access to information) and financial (financial management and planning across operating units). We examined the association between integration domains, the adoption of quality-focused care delivery processes, beneficiary utilization and health-related outcomes, and price-adjusted spending using linear regression adjusting for practice and beneficiary characteristics, weighting to account for sampling and nonresponse. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methods1 604 580 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 or older attributed to 2113 practices. Of these, 414 209 beneficiaries were considered clinically complex (frailty or 2 + chronic conditions). PRINCIPAL

findingsFinancial integration and clinical integration were weakly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0.19). Clinical integration was associated with significantly greater adoption of quality-focused care delivery processes, while financial integration was associated with lower adoption of these processes. Integration was not generally associated with reduced utilization or better beneficiary-level health-related outcomes, but both clinical integration and financial integration were associated with lower spending in both the complex and noncomplex cohorts: (clinical complex cohort: -$2518, [95% CI: -3324, -1712]; clinical noncomplex cohort: -$255 [95% CI: -413, -97]; financial complex cohort: -$997 [95% CI: -$1320, -$679]; and financial noncomplex cohort: -$143 [95% CI: -210, -$76]).

conclusionsHigher levels of financial integration were not associated with improved care delivery or with better health-related beneficiary outcomes. Nonfinancial forms of integration deserve greater attention, as practices scoring high in clinical integration are more likely to adopt quality-focused care delivery processes and have greater associated reductions in spending in complex patients.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsContinuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesEfficiency, OrganizationalFee-for-Service PlansGroup PracticeHealth Information SystemsHealth Services ResearchHumansMedicareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePhysiciansQuality of Health CareUnited Stateshealth care organizations and systemsintegrationMedicare

Identifiers

PMID33104254
PMCPMC7720705
OpenAlexW3094315785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.