Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104245›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health dentistry2020

Tracking oral health in a standardized, evidence-based, prevention-focused dental care system.

Joel M White, Ryan G Brandon, Joanna M Mullins, Kristen L Simmons, Aubri M Kottek, Elizabeth A Mertz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel M WhiteDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8950-697X
Ryan G BrandonWillamette Dental Group and Skourtes Institute, Hillsboro, OR, USA.
Joanna M MullinsWillamette Dental Group and Skourtes Institute, Hillsboro, OR, USA.
Kristen L SimmonsWillamette Dental Group and Skourtes Institute, Hillsboro, OR, USA.
Aubri M KottekDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Elizabeth A MertzDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USWillamette University · US

Funding

Implementing Dental Quality Measures in PracticeR01DE024166 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KALENDERIAN, ELSBETH, WALJI, MUHAMMAD · 2015 to 2025
$7.3M
Reducing Oral Health Disparities in Children: Assessing the Multilevel Impact of a Standardized Preventive Dental Care SystemR01MD013719 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MERTZ, ELIZABETH, WHITE, JOEL M · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024166NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE024166NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013719NIMHD NIH HHS R01MD013719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLearning health-care systems are foundational for measuring and achieving value in oral health care. This article describes the components of a preventive dental care program and the quality of care in a large dental accountable care organization.

methodsA retrospective study design describes and evaluates the cross-sectional measures of process of care (PoC), appropriateness of care (AoC), and outcomes of care (OoC) extracted from the electronic health record (EHR), between 2014 and 2019. Annual and composite measures are derived from EHR-based clinical decision support for risk determination, diagnostic and treatment terminology, and decayed-missing-filled-teeth (DMFT) measures.

resultsAnnually, 253,515 ± 27,850 patients were cared for with 618,084 ± 80,559 visits, 209,366 ± 22,300 exams, and 2,072,844 ± 300,363 clinical procedures. PoC metrics included provider adherence (98.3 percent) in completing caries risk assessments and patient receipt (96.9 percent) of a proactive dental care plan. AoC metrics included patients receiving prevention according to the risk-based protocol. The percent of patients at risk for caries receiving fluoride varnish was 95.4 ± 0.4 percent. OoC metrics included untreated decay and new decay. The 6-year average prevalence of untreated decay was 11.3 ± 0.3 percent, and average incidence of new decay was 13.6 ± 0.5 percent, increasing with risk level: low = 7.5 percent, medium = 18.8 percent, high = 29.4 percent, and extreme = 28.1 percent.

conclusionsThe preventive dental care system demonstrates excellent provider adherence to the evidence-based prevention protocol, with measurably better dental outcomes by patient risk compared to national estimates. These achievements are enabled by a value-centric, accountable model of care and incentivized by a compensation model aligned with performance measures.

Indexed as

Dental CariesOral HealthCross-Sectional StudiesDental CareHumansRetrospective Studiesdental cariesdental informaticsdentistryelectronic health recordsprimary preventionsecondary preventionvalue-based payment

Identifiers

PMID33104245
PMCPMC8638718
OpenAlexW3093961231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.