Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104079›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2020

Training in endotherapy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a UK-wide gastroenterology trainee survey.

Jonathan Segal, Keith Siau, Cynthia Kanagasundaram, Alan Askari, Paul Dunckley, Allan John Morris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan SegalGastroenterology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-0316
Keith SiauJoint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.
Cynthia KanagasundaramLuton and Dunstable Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Luton, UK.
Alan AskariDepartment of Surgery, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, Hertfordshire, UK.
Paul DunckleyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Allan John MorrisAcute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Endoscopy Quality Improvement Project Lead, British Society of Gastroenterology, London, UK.
Birmingham Dental Hospital · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBGloucestershire Royal Hospital · GBLuton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBWest Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCompetence in endoscopic haemostasis for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is typically expected upon completion of gastroenterology training. However, training in haemostasis is currently variable without a structured training pathway. We conducted a national gastroenterology trainee survey on haemostasis exposure and on attitudes and barriers to training.

methodsA 24-item electronic survey was distributed to UK gastroenterology trainees covering the following domains: demographics, training setup, attitudes and barriers, confidence in managing AUGIB independently and exposure to individual haemostatic modalities (supervised and independent). Responses were analysed by region and training grade to assess potential variation in training.

resultsA total of 181 trainees completed the questionnaire (response rate 33.5%). There was significant variation in AUGIB training setup across the UK (p<0.001), with 22.7% of trainees declaring no access to structured or ad hoc training. 31.5% expressed confidence in managing AUGIB independently; this varied by trainee grade (0% of first-year specialty trainees (ST3s) to 60.7% of final-years (ST7s)) and by training setup (p=0.001). ST7 trainees reported lack of experience with independently applying glue (86%), Hemospray (54%), heater probe (36%) and variceal banding (36%). Overall, 88% of trainees desired additional haemostasis training and 89% indicated support for a national certification process to ensure competence in AUGIB.

conclusionAUGIB training in the UK is variable. The majority of gastroenterology trainees lacked confidence in haemostasis management and desired additional training. Training provision should be urgently reviewed to ensure that trainees receive adequate haemostasis exposure and are competent by completion of training.

Indexed as

bleeding peptic ulcergastrointestinal bleedinggastrointestinal haemorrhageoesophageal varices

Identifiers

PMID33104079
PMCPMC7569523
OpenAlexW3004088748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.