Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104033›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2020

Evaluation and Effectiveness of Dementia Staff Training Programs in General Hospital Settings: A Narrative Synthesis with Holton's Three-Level Model Applied.

Mara Gkioka, Julia Schneider, Andreas Kruse, Magda Tsolaki, Despina Moraitou, Birgit Teichmann

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mara GkiokaNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julia SchneiderNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas KruseInstitute of Gerontology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Magda Tsolaki1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Despina MoraitouSchool of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Birgit TeichmannNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRAHEPA University Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with Dementia (PwD) are frequently admitted to hospital settings. The lack of proper dementia knowledge, poor communication skills, negative attitudes toward dementia, and lack of confidence affects the quality of care, thus development of dementia trainings has increased. Nevertheless, literature regarding the effectiveness of training implementation is limited.

objectiveThe aim of this narrative synthesis is to 1) identify the characteristics of training programs and 2) explore the effectiveness of these training programs in everyday clinical practice.

methodsA systematic search in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane was conducted, including qualitative and quantitative peer-reviewed studies. Holton's evaluation model with its three outcome levels (learning, individual performance, and organizational results) was adopted. 14 studies were included.

resultsThe synthesis of the results was divided into two parts: 1) to describe the characteristics and content of trainings 2) to evaluate the effectiveness of training programs according to the three outcome levels of Holton's model, taking into consideration its construct domains: ability, motivation, and environment. Learning outcomes were assessed in all selected studies: 13 studies observed changes in individual performance, four studies reported changes within the organizational level, and only five showed sustainable changes over time.

conclusionPerson-centered care (PCC) approaches, interactive and varied teaching methods, supporting conditions like champions, action plans, and setting care policies, are all characteristics of effective trainings. Successful programs should be sustainable over time, demonstrating positive outcomes across the organization. Based on current findings, there is a lack of adequate evaluation with regard to training programs on the organizational level.

Indexed as

Hospitals, GeneralDementiaEducational MeasurementHealth PersonnelHumansMedical Staff, HospitalModels, EducationalNursing Staff, HospitalOrganizational CulturePersonnel, HospitalStaff DevelopmentAlzheimer’s diseaseeducationhealth facilitiesliterature synthesispersonnelworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID33104033
PMCPMC7739966
OpenAlexW3094176656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.