Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104001›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

A Biological Age Model Designed for Health Promotion Interventions: Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Study for Model Development.

Karina Louise Skov Husted, Mathilde Fogelstrøm, Pernille Hulst, Andreas Brink-Kjær, Kaj-Åge Henneberg, Helge Bjarup Dissing Sorensen, Flemming Dela, Jørn Wulff Helge

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03680768 completednot on this map

Development of a New Biological Age Technology Applicable in Public Health Promotion Interventions.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2018 to 2019Enrolled100ConditionsAging, HealthyArmsHealth Assessment
NCT04279366 completednot on this map

Evaluation and Validation of Biological Age as Health Technology

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2020 to 2022Enrolled83ConditionsHealthy Aging, Lifestyle Risk ReductionArmsLifestyle intervention
NCT05356871 completednot on this map

Validity and Reliability of a Clinical Method for Assessment of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Using Seismocardiography

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2020 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsCardiorespiratory Fitness TestArmsVO2max validity and reliability assesment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karina Louise Skov HustedXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-1694
Mathilde FogelstrømXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-5694
Pernille HulstXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5371-0792
Andreas Brink-KjærDigital Health, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2872-0929
Kaj-Åge HennebergBiomedical Engineering, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-6587
Helge Bjarup Dissing SorensenDigital Health, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5716-7600
Flemming DelaXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9970-9535
Jørn Wulff HelgeXlab, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-5423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActions to improve healthy aging and delay morbidity are crucial, given the global aging population. We believe that biological age estimation can help promote the health of the general population. Biological age reflects the heterogeneity in functional status and vulnerability to disease that chronological age cannot. Thus, biological age assessment is a tool that provides an intuitively meaningful outcome for the general population, and as such, facilitates our understanding of the extent to which lifestyle can increase health span.

objectiveThis interdisciplinary study intends to develop a biological age model and explore its usefulness.

methodsThe model development comprised three consecutive phases: (1) conducting a cross-sectional study to gather candidate biomarkers from 100 individuals representing normal healthy aging people (the derivation cohort); (2) estimating the biological age using principal component analysis; and (3) testing the clinical use of the model in a validation cohort of overweight adults attending a lifestyle intervention course.

resultsWe completed the data collection and analysis of the cross-sectional study, and the initial results of the principal component analysis are ready. Interpretation and refinement of the model is ongoing. Recruitment to the validation cohort is forthcoming. We expect the results to be published by December 2021.

conclusionsWe expect the biological age model to be a useful indicator of disease risk and metabolic risk, and further research should focus on validating the model on a larger scale.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03680768, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03680768 (Phase 1 study); NCT04279366 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04279366 (Phase 3 study). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/19209.

Indexed as

biological agehealth promotionhealthy agingprincipal component analysisprotocol

Identifiers

PMID33104001
PMCPMC7652682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.