Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33103803›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2021

Emerging Immunotherapies in the Treatment of Brain Metastases.

Edwin Nieblas-Bedolla, Naema Nayyar, Mohini Singh, Ryan J Sullivan, Priscilla K Brastianos

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Oral IRAK-4 Inhibitor CA-4948 Is Blood-Brain Barrier Penetrant and Has Single-Agent Activity against CNS Lymphoma and Melanoma Brain Metastases.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Advances in Brain Metastasis Models.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edwin Nieblas-BedollaUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Naema NayyarProgram in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Mohini SinghCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ryan J SullivanCancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Priscilla K BrastianosBroad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-8425
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Identification of genomic drivers of brain metastases in lung adenocarcinomaR01CA227156 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BRASTIANOS, PRISCILLA KALIOPI, CARTER, SCOTT · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Using MRI and circulating tumor DNA to improve the interpretation of response to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in CNS metastasesR01CA244975 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BRASTIANOS, PRISCILLA KALIOPI, GERSTNER, ELIZABETH · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Damon Runyon Cancer Research FoundationNCI NIH HHS R01 CA227156NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244975NIH HHS 1R01CA227156-01NIH HHS 1R01CA244975-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastases account for considerable morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Despite increasing prevalence, limited therapeutic options exist. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular and cellular underpinnings of the tumor immune microenvironment and the immune evasive mechanisms employed by tumor cells have shed light on how immunotherapies may provide therapeutic benefit to patients. The development and evolution of immunotherapy continue to show promise for the treatment of brain metastases. Positive outcomes have been observed in several studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of these treatments. However, many challenges persist in the application of immunotherapies to brain metastases. This review discusses the potential benefits and challenges in the development and use of checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and oncolytic viruses for the treatment of brain metastases. Future studies are necessary to further evaluate and assess the potential use of each of these therapies in this setting. As we gain more knowledge regarding the role immunotherapies may play in the treatment of brain metastases, it is important to consider how these treatments may guide clinical decision making for clinicians and the impact they may have on patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Immunotherapies have produced clinically significant outcomes in early clinical trials evaluating patients with brain metastases or demonstrated promising results in preclinical models. Checkpoint inhibitors have been the most common immunotherapy studied to date in the setting of brain metastases, but novel approaches that can harness the immune system to contain and eliminate cancer cells are currently under investigation and may soon become more common in the clinical setting. An understanding of these evolving therapies may be useful in determining how the future management and treatment of brain metastases among patients with cancer will continue to advance.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImmunotherapyHumansTumor MicroenvironmentBrain metastasisImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33103803
PMCPMC7930434
OpenAlexW3093887271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.