Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33103656›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

How many neurons are sufficient for perception of cortical activity?

Henry Wp Dalgleish, Lloyd E Russell, Adam M Packer, Arnd Roth, Oliver M Gauld, Francesca Greenstreet, Emmett J Thompson, Michael Häusser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Importance of Synchrony in the Neural Control of Movement.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Critical scaling of novelty in the cortex.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Information transfer and recovery for the sense of touch.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henry Wp Dalgleish *Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-6361
Lloyd E Russell *Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6332-756X
Adam M Packer *Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5884-794X
Arnd RothWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0325-4287
Oliver M GauldWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Francesca GreenstreetWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emmett J ThompsonWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael HäusserWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2673-8957
Wolfson Foundation · GB

Funding

ERC 695709Medical Research Council MR/T022922/1Wellcome Trust 201225Wellcome Trust 201225/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 204651/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many theories of brain function propose that activity in sparse subsets of neurons underlies perception and action. To place a lower bound on the amount of neural activity that can be perceived, we used an all-optical approach to drive behaviour with targeted two-photon optogenetic activation of small ensembles of L2/3 pyramidal neurons in mouse barrel cortex while simultaneously recording local network activity with two-photon calcium imaging. By precisely titrating the number of neurons stimulated, we demonstrate that the lower bound for perception of cortical activity is ~14 pyramidal neurons. We find a steep sigmoidal relationship between the number of activated neurons and behaviour, saturating at only ~37 neurons, and show this relationship can shift with learning. Furthermore, activation of ensembles is balanced by inhibition of neighbouring neurons. This surprising perceptual sensitivity in the face of potent network suppression supports the sparse coding hypothesis, and suggests that cortical perception balances a trade-off between minimizing the impact of noise while efficiently detecting relevant signals.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexMiceNerve NetOptogeneticsPyramidal CellsSingle-Cell Analysis2-photon imagingbehaviourcortexmouseneural codingneuroscienceoptogeneticsperception

Identifiers

PMID33103656
PMCPMC7695456
OpenAlexW3093501202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.