ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2021
Advances in biomarker development and potential application for preeclampsia based on pathogenesis.
Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive Performance of Placental Protein 13 for Screening Preeclampsia in the First Trimester: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Novel biomarkers for preeclampsia: Promises and pitfalls.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2025Review
- Prevention of Pre-Eclampsia: Modern Strategies and the Role of Early Screening.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Serum macrophage stimulating protein α-chain and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in the first trimester for the prediction of preeclampsia.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Pre-pregnancy body mass index combined with peripheral blood PLGF, DCN, LDH, and UA in a risk prediction model for pre-eclampsia.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Impact of elevated first and second trimester white blood cells on prevalence of late-onset preeclampsia.Heliyon · 2022Article
- COVID-19 and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and thrombocytopenia syndrome in pregnant women - association or causation?World journal of virology · 2022Review
- COVID-19 and Preeclampsia: Overlapping Features in Pregnancy.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2022Review
- Article
- The Diagnostic Potential of Gut Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Preeclampsia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Preeclampsia Emerging as a Risk Factor of Cardiovascular Disease in Women.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific complication that seriously threatens the health and safety of mothers and infants. The etiology of PE has not been fully elucidated, and no effective treatments are currently available. A pregnant woman with PE often has to make a tough choice on either endangering her own health to give a birth or being forced to terminate her pregnancy. It is recommended by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics that the combination of maternal high-risk factors and biomarkers could form a good strategy for predicting the risk of PE. Such a combination may also enable more effective monitoring and early clinical intervention in high-risk populations to reduce the risk of PE. Therefore, biomarkers validated by extensive clinical research may be formally applied for clinical PE risk prediction. In this review, we summarized data from clinical research on potential biomarkers and classified them according to the current four major hypotheses, namely placental or trophoblast ischemia and hypoxia, vascular endothelial injury, oxidative stress, and immune dysregulation. Additionally, we also discussed the underlying mechanisms by which these potential biomarkers may be involved in the pathogenesis of PE. Finally, we propose that multiple biomarkers reflecting different aspects of the disease pathogenesis should be used in combination to detect the high-risk PE population in support of clinically targeted intervention and prevention of PE. It is expected that tests made of more sensitive and reliable PE biomarkers based on the aforementioned major hypotheses could potentially improve the accuracy of PE prediction in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.