Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33103113›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2021

Advances in biomarker development and potential application for preeclampsia based on pathogenesis.

Nan Liu, Yu-Na Guo, Li-Kun Gong, Bing-Shun Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Novel biomarkers for preeclampsia: Promises and pitfalls.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. COVID-19 and Preeclampsia: Overlapping Features in Pregnancy.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Preeclampsia Emerging as a Risk Factor of Cardiovascular Disease in Women.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nan LiuSchool of Pharmacy, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Yu-Na GuoDepartment of Obstetrics, International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Li-Kun GongSchool of Pharmacy, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Bing-Shun WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 227 South Chongqing Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific complication that seriously threatens the health and safety of mothers and infants. The etiology of PE has not been fully elucidated, and no effective treatments are currently available. A pregnant woman with PE often has to make a tough choice on either endangering her own health to give a birth or being forced to terminate her pregnancy. It is recommended by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics that the combination of maternal high-risk factors and biomarkers could form a good strategy for predicting the risk of PE. Such a combination may also enable more effective monitoring and early clinical intervention in high-risk populations to reduce the risk of PE. Therefore, biomarkers validated by extensive clinical research may be formally applied for clinical PE risk prediction. In this review, we summarized data from clinical research on potential biomarkers and classified them according to the current four major hypotheses, namely placental or trophoblast ischemia and hypoxia, vascular endothelial injury, oxidative stress, and immune dysregulation. Additionally, we also discussed the underlying mechanisms by which these potential biomarkers may be involved in the pathogenesis of PE. Finally, we propose that multiple biomarkers reflecting different aspects of the disease pathogenesis should be used in combination to detect the high-risk PE population in support of clinically targeted intervention and prevention of PE. It is expected that tests made of more sensitive and reliable PE biomarkers based on the aforementioned major hypotheses could potentially improve the accuracy of PE prediction in the future.

Indexed as

BiomarkerHypothesisPredictPreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID33103113
PMCPMC7575783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.