Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33103052›Full record

ReviewJournal of cognition2020

Mental Fatigue Might Be Not So Bad for Exercise Performance After All: A Systematic Review and Bias-Sensitive Meta-Analysis.

Darías Holgado, Daniel Sanabria, José C Perales, Miguel A Vadillo

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Mental Fatigue-Associated Decrease in Table Tennis Performance: Is There an Electrophysiological Signature?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  9. Investigating the Effects of Mental Fatigue on Resistance Exercise Performance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  10. Review
  11. Task Failure in Endurance Sports: A Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Darías HolgadoCentro de Investigación, Mente, Cerebro y Comportamiento (CIMCYC), Universidad de Granada, ES.ORCID 0000-0003-3211-8006
Daniel SanabriaCentro de Investigación, Mente, Cerebro y Comportamiento (CIMCYC), Universidad de Granada, ES.
José C PeralesCentro de Investigación, Mente, Cerebro y Comportamiento (CIMCYC), Universidad de Granada, ES.
Miguel A VadilloDepartamento de Psicología Básica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, ES.ORCID 0000-0001-8421-816X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate in the scientific community regarding whether a state of mental fatigue may have a negative effect upon a range of objective and subjective measures of human performance. This issue has attracted attention from several fields, including sport and exercise sciences. In fact, a considerable body of literature in the sport science field has suggested that performing a long and demanding cognitive task might lead to a state of mental fatigue, impairing subsequent exercise performance, although research in this field has shown contradictory results. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate these inconsistent findings. The analysis yielded small-to-medium effects of mental fatigue on exercise performance,

Indexed as

Cognitive ControlExecutive functionsmental effortStatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID33103052
PMCPMC7546119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.