ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2021
Immune cell Dilemma in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: To Heal or Not to Heal.
Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac macrophage metabolism in health and disease.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2024Review
- Article
- TNFR1 Contributes to Activation-Induced Cell Death of Pathological CD4JACC. Basic to translational science · 2022Article
- Covert actions of growth hormone: fibrosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancer.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022Review
- Estrogen Receptor-β Agonists Modulate T-Lymphocyte Activation and Ameliorate Left Ventricular Remodeling During Chronic Heart Failure.Circulation. Heart failure · 2022Article
- Changes in extracellular matrix in failing human non-ischemic and ischemic hearts with mechanical unloading.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2022Article
- Estrogenic bias in T-Lymphocyte biology: Implications for cardiovascular disease.Pharmacological research · 2021Review
- Immune Cells and Immunotherapy for Cardiac Injury and Repair.Circulation research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Inflammation is a double-edged sword for sterile tissue injury such as in myocardial infarction (MI). After ischemic injury, inflammatory immune responses activate repair processes, clear tissue-debris, form a stable scar and initiate angiogenesis in the myocardium for efficient wound-healing. However, incomplete immune resolution or sustained low-grade inflammation lead to ischemic cardiomyopathy (IC) characterized by maladaptive tissue remodeling and left-ventricular dilatation. It is clear that a delicate balance of cytokines, chemokines, prostaglandins, resolvins, and the innate and adaptive immune systems is critical for adequate healing as both insufficient- or overt-activation of inflammatory responses can either enhance rupture incidence or exacerbate cardiac dysfunction in the long-term. Among all the players, immune cells are the most critical as they are not only a source for all of the inflammatory protein mediators, but are also a target. However, phenotypic complexities associated with different immune subtypes, their interdependence, phasic-activations and varied functionalities often make it difficult to segregate the effects of one immune cell from another. In this review, we briefly summarize the role of several innate and adaptive immune cells to acquaint readers with complex immune-networks that dictate the extent of wound-healing post-MI and maladaptive remodeling during IC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.