Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33103018›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2020

Cochlear mechanics: new insights from vibrometry and Optical Coherence Tomography.

Elizabeth S Olson, C Elliott Strimbu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Imaging theJournal of biomedical optics · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Remarkable Outer Hair Cell: Proceedings of a Symposium in Honour of W. E. Brownell.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Auditory tuning in the bushcricket miniature hearing organ.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Tuned vibration modes in a miniature hearing organ: Insights from the bushcricket.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth S OlsonDepartment of Otolaryngolgy Head and Neck Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032.
C Elliott StrimbuDepartment of Otolaryngolgy Head and Neck Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032.

Funding

Diversity Supplement to Auditory Mechanics and Cochlear AmplificationR01DC015362 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELIZABETH S. OLSON · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlea is a complex biological machine that transduces sound-induced mechanical vibrations to neural signals. Hair cells within the sensory tissue of the cochlea transduce vibrations into electrical signals, and exert electromechanical feedback that enhances the passive frequency separation provided by the cochlea's traveling wave mechanics; this enhancement is termed cochlear amplification. The vibration of the sensory tissue has been studied with many techniques, and the current state of the art is optical coherence tomography (OCT). The OCT technique allows for motion of intra-organ structures to be measured

Indexed as

cochleacochlear amplifierhair celloptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID33103018
PMCPMC7584129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.