Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33102964›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2020

Factors Associated With Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Complications in ESRD.

José L Hernández-Castillo, Joana Balderas-Juárez, Omar Jiménez-Zarazúa, Karen Guerrero-Toriz, Michelle P Loeza-Uribe, Erika K Tenorio-Aguirre, Jesús G Mendoza-García, Jaime D Mondragón

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Percutaneous Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Truly Urgent "Urgent-Start" Peritoneal Dialysis.Kidney international reports · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

José L Hernández-CastilloFacultad de Medicina, Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Joana Balderas-JuárezFacultad de Medicina, Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Omar Jiménez-ZarazúaDepartment of Medicine and Nutrition, Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico.
Karen Guerrero-TorizFacultad de Medicina, Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Michelle P Loeza-UribeFacultad de Medicina, Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Erika K Tenorio-AguirreFacultad de Medicina, Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jesús G Mendoza-GarcíaFacultad de Medicina, Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jaime D MondragónDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversidad de León · MXUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUrgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with newly diagnosed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a well-tolerated alternative to hemodialysis (HD). The primary aim of this study was to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of ESRD patients, as well as the presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical factors associated with urgent-start PD complications.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional observational study was performed on 102 patients with ESRD who merited urgent-start PD from January 2015 to June 2019. The primary clinical outcome measures were catheter leakage, dysfunction, and peritonitis, whereas the secondary outcomes were catheter removal, repositioning, and death. Statistical inferences were made with the χ

resultsOne hundred two subjects (65 men, 63.7%) 56.2 ± 15.1 years old were included in this study; 64 of the subjects had diabetes and hypertension (62.7%). Catheter leakage occurred in 8 patients (7.8%), catheter dysfunction in 27 patients (26.5%), and peritonitis in 14 patients (13.7%); meanwhile, catheter removal occurred in 6 patients (5.9%), catheter repositioning in 21 patients (20.6%), and death in 3 patients (2.9%). Peritonitis was associated with younger age (i.e., 47.0 ± 16.8 vs. 57.6 ± 14.4 years;

conclusionPeritonitis was associated with younger age, higher creatinine levels upon admission, and heart failure; meanwhile, catheter removal was linked to obesity and lower glomerular filtration rate. Compared with previous reports, our study included patients in which PD was initiated shortly after catheter insertion, making the intervention a true urgent-start PD. This study contributes to the existing urgent-start PD literature by providing evidence that urgent-start PD with catheter opening within 72 hours has limited complications, making it a relatively safe option.

Indexed as

catheter dysfunctionend-stage renal diseaseremovalrepositioningurgent-start peritoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID33102964
PMCPMC7572310
OpenAlexW3044176139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.