ArticleKidney international reports2020
Factors Associated With Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Complications in ESRD.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and feasibility of initiating peritoneal dialysis within 24 h after percutaneous versus surgical catheter placement.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Randomized Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Enema in the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Dysfunction.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Complications Related to Urgent Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis in a Mexican Hospital with Limited Resources: A Prospective Cohort.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Automated peritoneal dialysis with shortened break-in periods in urgent-start scenarios: A retrospective cohort study.World journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Percutaneous Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Review
- The prognostic values of estimating intraperitoneal pressure in the occurrence of abdominal wall complications in peritoneal dialysis patients.Journal of nephrology · 2024Article
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Novel equations for estimating intraperitoneal pressure among peritoneal dialysis patients.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
- Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Risk Factors and Management of Catheter Malfunction During Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Truly Urgent "Urgent-Start" Peritoneal Dialysis.Kidney international reports · 2020Article
- Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUrgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with newly diagnosed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a well-tolerated alternative to hemodialysis (HD). The primary aim of this study was to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of ESRD patients, as well as the presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical factors associated with urgent-start PD complications.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional observational study was performed on 102 patients with ESRD who merited urgent-start PD from January 2015 to June 2019. The primary clinical outcome measures were catheter leakage, dysfunction, and peritonitis, whereas the secondary outcomes were catheter removal, repositioning, and death. Statistical inferences were made with the χ
resultsOne hundred two subjects (65 men, 63.7%) 56.2 ± 15.1 years old were included in this study; 64 of the subjects had diabetes and hypertension (62.7%). Catheter leakage occurred in 8 patients (7.8%), catheter dysfunction in 27 patients (26.5%), and peritonitis in 14 patients (13.7%); meanwhile, catheter removal occurred in 6 patients (5.9%), catheter repositioning in 21 patients (20.6%), and death in 3 patients (2.9%). Peritonitis was associated with younger age (i.e., 47.0 ± 16.8 vs. 57.6 ± 14.4 years;
conclusionPeritonitis was associated with younger age, higher creatinine levels upon admission, and heart failure; meanwhile, catheter removal was linked to obesity and lower glomerular filtration rate. Compared with previous reports, our study included patients in which PD was initiated shortly after catheter insertion, making the intervention a true urgent-start PD. This study contributes to the existing urgent-start PD literature by providing evidence that urgent-start PD with catheter opening within 72 hours has limited complications, making it a relatively safe option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.