Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33102853›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Comparison of AlphaLISA and RIA assays for measurement of wool cortisol concentrations.

T Peric, A Comin, M Corazzin, M Montillo, A Prandi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

T PericDipartimento di Scienze Agroalimentari, Ambientali e Animali, DI4A, Università degli Studi di Udine, Via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy.
A CominDipartimento di Scienze Agroalimentari, Ambientali e Animali, DI4A, Università degli Studi di Udine, Via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy.
M CorazzinDipartimento di Scienze Agroalimentari, Ambientali e Animali, DI4A, Università degli Studi di Udine, Via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy.
M MontilloDipartimento di Scienze Agroalimentari, Ambientali e Animali, DI4A, Università degli Studi di Udine, Via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy.
A PrandiDipartimento di Scienze Agroalimentari, Ambientali e Animali, DI4A, Università degli Studi di Udine, Via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy.
University of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radioimmunoassay (RIA) methods have always represented a technique of choice for the determination of steroids in biological samples. The Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogenous Assay-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (AlphaLISA) is now emerging as the new-generation immunoassay technology that does not require washing/separation steps. The aim of this study was to adapt the Perkin-Elmer's AlphaLISA kit for wool cortisol and compare it with a RIA wool cortisol assay. Wool from lambs, 35 at birth (A0) and 54 at two months old (A2), was collected and each extract was evaluated for wool cortisol concentrations (HCC) both by RIA and AlphaLISA immunoassay. The two methods showed good precision, sensitivity and specificity for determining HCC. Both methods were able to detect significant differences between the high and the low HCC assessed in lambs at A0 and A2 (

Indexed as

AlphaLISAAnimal physiologyAnimal scienceBiological sciencesEndocrinologyGlucocorticoidsLambRIASheepVeterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID33102853
PMCPMC7569336
OpenAlexW3092666268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.