Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33102759›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2020

Baseline angiopoietin-2 and FGF19 levels predict treatment response in patients receiving multikinase inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Taku Shigesawa, Goki Suda, Megumi Kimura, Tomoe Shimazaki, Osamu Maehara, Ren Yamada, Takashi Kitagataya, Kazuharu Suzuki, Akihisa Nakamura, Masatsugu Ohara and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers Predictive of Survival Benefit with Lenvatinib in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From the Phase III REFLECT Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taku ShigesawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Goki SudaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-9106
Megumi KimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Tomoe ShimazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Osamu MaeharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Ren YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Takashi KitagatayaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Kazuharu SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Akihisa NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Masatsugu OharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Machiko UmemuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Naoki KawagishiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-6242
Masato NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Takuya ShoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Mitsuteru NatsuizakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Kenichi MorikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Koji OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Naoya SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Department of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSorafenib and lenvatinib are first-line systemic therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the criteria for their selection remain unclear.

methodsWe identified patients with unresectable HCC who were treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib between August 2009 and January 2019 at the Hokkaido University Hospital. Patients who continued treatment for >2 months, underwent evaluation by computed tomography every 2-3 months, and had complete clinical data were included. Responders were patients with objective response (OR) for lenvatinib and patients with stable disease (SD) exceeding 6 months (long-SD) or OR for sorafenib. The predictive factors for treatment response, including fibroblast growth factor (FGF)19 and 21, angiopoietin 2 (ANG2), hepatocyte growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor, were evaluated.

resultsOverall, 27 and 29 patients treated with lenvatinib and sorafenib, respectively, were included. The responders for lenvatinib and sorafenib were 63% (17/27) and 38% (11/29), respectively. No significant predictive factors for treatment response were identified in patients treated with sorafenib. However, baseline serum FGF19 and ANG2 levels were significantly associated with treatment response to lenvatinib. All (9/9) patients with low baseline ANG2 and FGF19 levels who received lenvatinib achieved OR. Conversely, the OR was low (13%; 1/9) in patients with high baseline ANG2 and FGF19 levels. Responder rate was 40% (2/5) in patients with high baseline ANG2 and FGF19 levels who received sorafenib.

conclusionThis study is, to our knowledge, the first to demonstrate that baseline ANG2 and FGF19 levels may aid in selecting optimal systemic therapy for patients with unresectable HCC.

Indexed as

angiopoietin‐2fibroblast growth factor 19hepatocellular carcinomasorafenibtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID33102759
PMCPMC7578287
OpenAlexW3015552590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.