ArticleInformatics in medicine unlocked2020
Ensemble learning model for diagnosing COVID-19 from routine blood tests.
Article in Informatics in medicine unlocked, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting Zygosity based on physical similarity of twin pairs with the aid of machine learning methods.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Ensemble learning to enhance accurate identification of patients with glaucoma using electronic health records.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- XGBMUT: Predicting the Functional Impact of Missense Mutations Using an Extreme Gradient Boost Classifier.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Towards Improved XAI-Based Epidemiological Research into the Next Potential Pandemic.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prediction of atrial fibrillation and stroke using machine learning models in UK Biobank.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A brief review and scientometric analysis on ensemble learning methods for handling COVID-19.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Synergistic integration of Multi-View Brain Networks and advanced machine learning techniques for auditory disorders diagnostics.Brain informatics · 2024Article
- MENet: A Mitscherlich function based ensemble of CNN models to classify lung cancer using CT scans.PloS one · 2024Article
- Smart medical report: efficient detection of common and rare diseases on common blood tests.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Algorithms for predicting COVID outcome using ready-to-use laboratorial and clinical data.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- A Genetic algorithm aided hyper parameter optimization based ensemble model for respiratory disease prediction with Explainable AI.PloS one · 2024Article
- Prediction of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on machine learning.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Predicting adverse outcomes in pregnant patients positive for SARS-CoV-2: a machine learning approach- a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- A Survey of COVID-19 Diagnosis Using Routine Blood Tests with the Aid of Artificial Intelligence Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The prediction of distant metastasis risk for male breast cancer patients based on an interpretable machine learning model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Semi-Supervised KPCA-Based Monitoring Techniques for Detecting COVID-19 Infection through Blood Tests.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- ETISTP: An Enhanced Model for Brain Tumor Identification and Survival Time Prediction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Decision Support System for Diagnosis of COVID-19 from Non-COVID-19 Influenza-like Illness Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Equilibrium-based COVID-19 diagnosis from routine blood tests: A sparse deep convolutional model.Expert systems with applications · 2023Article
- Analyzing the effect of data preprocessing techniques using machine learning algorithms on the diagnosis of COVID-19.Concurrency and computation : practice & experience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe pandemic of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has severely impacted human society with a massive death toll worldwide. There is an urgent need for early and reliable screening of COVID-19 patients to provide better and timely patient care and to combat the spread of the disease. In this context, recent studies have reported some key advantages of using routine blood tests for initial screening of COVID-19 patients. In this article, first we present a review of the emerging techniques for COVID-19 diagnosis using routine laboratory and/or clinical data. Then, we propose ERLX which is an ensemble learning model for COVID-19 diagnosis from routine blood tests.
methodThe proposed model uses three well-known diverse classifiers, extra trees, random forest and logistic regression, which have different architectures and learning characteristics at the first level, and then combines their predictions by using a second level extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier to achieve a better performance. For data preparation, the proposed methodology employs a KNNImputer algorithm to handle null values in the dataset, isolation forest (iForest) to remove outlier data, and a synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to balance data distribution. For model interpretability, features importance are reported by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique.
resultsThe proposed model was trained and evaluated by using a publicly available data set from Albert Einstein Hospital in Brazil, which consisted of 5644 data samples with 559 confirmed COVID-19 cases. The ensemble model achieved outstanding performance with an overall accuracy of 99.88% [95% CI: 99.6-100], AUC of 99.38% [95% CI: 97.5-100], a sensitivity of 98.72% [95% CI: 94.6-100] and a specificity of 99.99% [95% CI: 99.99-100]. DISCUSSION: The proposed model revealed better performance when compared against existing state-of-the-art studies (Banerjee et al., 2020; de Freitas Barbosa et al., 2020; de Moraes Batista et al., 2020; Soares et al., 2020) [3,22,56,71] for the same set of features employed by them. As compared to the best performing Bayes Net model (de Freitas Barbosa et al., 2020) [22] average accuracy of 95.159%, ERLX achieved an average accuracy of 99.94%. In comparison with AUC of 85% reported by the SVM model (de Moraes Batista et al., 2020) [56], ERLX obtained AUC of 99.77% in addition to improvements in sensitivity, and specificity. As compared with ER-COV model (Soares et al., 2020) [71] average sensitivity of 70.25% and specificity of 85.98%, ERLX model achieved sensitivity of 99.47% and specificity of 99.99%. The ERLX model obtained a considerably higher score as compared with ANN model (Banerjee et al., 2020) [3] in all performance metrics. Therefore, the model presented is robust and can be deployed for reliable early and rapid screening of COVID-19 patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.