ArticleData in brief2020
Data on chemical-gene interactions and biological categories enriched with genes sensitive to chemical exposures.
Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Underexplored Molecular Mechanisms of Toxicity.Journal of xenobiotics · 2024Article
- Towards Whole Health Toxicology: In-Silico Prediction of Diseases Sensitive to Multi-Chemical Exposures.Toxics · 2022Article
- Chemical Exposures Affect Innate Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A dataset of chemical-gene interactions was created by extracting data from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) with the following filtering criteria: data was extracted only from experiments that used human, rat, or mouse cells/tissues and used high-throughput approaches for gene expression analysis. Genes not present in genomes of all three species were filtered out. The resulting dataset included 591,084 chemical-gene interaction. All chemical compounds in the database were annotated for their major uses. For every gene in the database number of chemical-gene interactions was calculated and used as a metric of gene sensitivity to a variety of chemical exposures. The lists of genes with corresponding numbers of chemical-gene interactions were used in gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to identify potential sensitivity to chemical exposures of molecular pathways in Hallmark, KEGG and Reactome collections. Thus, data presented here represent unbiased and searchable datasets of sensitivity of genes and molecular pathways to a broad range of chemical exposures. As such the data can be used for a diverse range of toxicological and regulatory applications. Approach for the identification of molecular mechanisms sensitive to chemical exposures may inform regulatory toxicology about best toxicity testing strategies. Analysis of sensitivity of genes and molecular pathways to chemical exposures based on these datasets was published in Chemosphere (Suvorov et al., 2021) [1].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.