ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2020
History, development and clinical perspectives of sutureless and rapid deployment surgical aortic valve replacement.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing short- and long-term outcomes of transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: a literature review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Comparing outcomes of TAVI and SAVR in low or intermediate risk symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement over TAVI: a real-world retrospective cohort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Biomechanical comparison of intuity vs. perceval aortic bioprosthesis: apples & oranges or swings & roundabouts?Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Acurate Neo2 for valve-in-valve treatment of degenerated 3F Enable sutureless bioprosthetic valve in nonagenarian patient: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- A rapid deployment valve option for failing Medtronic Freestyle full root: a single centre experience.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Sutureless vs. rapid-deployment valve: a systemic review and meta-analysis for a direct comparison of intraoperative performance and clinical outcomes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Patient Selection and Special Considerations.Vascular health and risk management · 2023Review
- Sutureless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: Surgical and clinical outcomes.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2022Article
- Updates on the Latest Surgical Approach of the Aortic Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degenerative aortic stenosis is the most frequent valvular heart disease in industrialized countries. Conservative treatment may beneficially influence symptoms but is never successful. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was the only recognized treatment option to provide substantially prolonged survival until 2008. Operative mortality of isolated SAVR has been reported as low as 0.5% to 1% in experienced institutions, while long-term survival is close to that observed in a control healthy population of similar age. A multitude of studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of SAVR with regard to improvement in quality of life and physical performance in the majority of symptomatic patients. In the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an equal treatment modality, first in patients with high surgical risk and more recently in patients with intermediate and low surgical risk. Paravalvular regurgitation and the higher rate of pacemaker implantation remain points of consideration. Additionally, the long-term durability of TAVI devices and occurrence of stroke late after TAVI require additional analyses. Sutureless (SU-SAVR) and rapid deployment valve (R-SAVR) were designed to simplify and accelerate a conventional or less invasive surgical procedure while allowing complete excision of the calcified native valve. From 3 different implants tested more than 10 to 15 years ago, only two are available on the market today: the Perceval
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.