Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33102137›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2020

Analysis of waterpipe aerosol constituents in accordance with the ISO standard 22486.

Guy Jaccard, Donatien Tafin Djoko, Alexandra Korneliou, Maxim Belushkin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chemical Constituents and Particle Size Distribution of Mainstream Emission From Electronic Waterpipe.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Toxicity of waterpipe tobacco smoking: the role of flavors, sweeteners, humectants, and charcoal.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guy JaccardPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products SA, Quai Jeanrenaud 5, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Donatien Tafin DjokoPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products SA, Quai Jeanrenaud 5, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Alexandra KorneliouPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products SA, Quai Jeanrenaud 5, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Maxim BelushkinPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products SA, Quai Jeanrenaud 5, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyzed commercial waterpipe tobacco products in accordance with the newly developed ISO 22486 as well as with commercial waterpipes and charcoals using the ISO 22486 puffing regime for comparison. The aerosols from these products were analyzed for their nicotine, humectant, tobacco specific nitrosamine, carbonyl, benzo[

Indexed as

AldehydesBaP, benzo[a]pyreneCharcoals for waterpipeFormaldehydeHPHC, harmful and potentially harmful constituentsISO 22486NAB, N’-nitrosoanabasineNAT, N’-nitrosoanatabineNNK, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-bipyridyl)-1-butanoneNNN, N’-nitrosonornicotinePAH, polyaromatic hydrocarbonsPG, propyleneglycolRS, reducing sugarsTA, total alkaloidsTCM, total collected matterTSNA, tobacco specific nitrosaminesWaterpipeWaterpipe aerosols

Identifiers

PMID33102137
PMCPMC7569180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.