ArticleToxicology reports2020
Aflatoxin M1 detection by ELISA in raw and processed milk in Bangladesh.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Aflatoxin MVeterinary medicine and science · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping Global Research Trends on Aflatoxin M1 in Dairy Products: An Integrative Review of Prevalence, Toxicology, and Control Approaches.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Determination of Aflatoxin MFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Aflatoxin MToxins · 2025Article
- Occurrence of Aflatoxin M1 over Three Years in Raw Milk from Croatia: Exposure Assessment and Risk Characterization in Consumers of Different Ages and Genders.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Aflatoxin M1 Determination in Whole Milk with Immersible Silicon Photonic Immunosensor.Toxins · 2025Article
- Sensitive Aflatoxin M1 Detection in Milk by ELISA: Investigation of Different Assay Configurations.Toxins · 2024Article
- A field-portable electrochemical immunosensor based on a multifunctional AgNanoscale advances · 2024Article
- Risk of exposure to aflatoxin M1 through consumption of cow's milk among children in Magadu, Morogoro.Mycotoxin research · 2024Article
- [Determination of 22 mycotoxins in milk by liquid chromatography-quadrupole/orbitrap mass spectrometry].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2023Article
- Mach-Zehnder Interferometric Immunosensor for Detection of Aflatoxin M1 in Milk, Chocolate Milk, and Yogurt.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Article
- Seasonal Occurrence of Aflatoxin M1 in Raw Milk during a Five-Year Period in Croatia: Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Selective and Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor for Aflatoxin M1 with a Molybdenum Disulfide Quantum Dot/Metal-Organic Framework Nanocomposite.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Review
- Occurrence of aflatoxin MMycotoxin research · 2021Article
- The Presence of Aflatoxin MToxins · 2021Article
- Aflatoxins in randomly selected groundnuts (Toxicology reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An analysis was accomplished to get information regarding presence of highly toxic and carcinogenic aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in raw and processed samples of milk applying ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay). Investigation of a set of 100 samples (n=100) taken from different regional small-scale farms as well as grocery stores of Bangladesh containing three groups of milk including raw (n=50), pasteurized (n=25) and UHT (n=25), exhibited in total 53% AFM1 contamination where 70% contamination was found in raw milk ranging from 22.79-1489.28 ng/kg (mean value 699.07 ng/kg), 52% in pasteurized milk ranging from 18.11-672.18 ng/kg (mean value 99.77 ng/kg) and 20% in UHT milk ranging from 25.07-48.95 ng/kg (mean value 35.46 ng/kg). Among all the positive samples, 75% contaminated samples were above the European Communities prescribed limits (50 ng/kg) while having 25% samples still below this limit whereas 43% samples crossed the accepted limit of US regulations/Codex Alimentarius Commission regulations (500 ng/kg). Thus the findings of this study may lead to increase awareness regarding health impact of aflatoxin M1 and implementation of strict regulations by law enforcement bureaus of Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.