ArticleCureus2020
Inhaler Use Technique in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Errors, Practices and Barriers.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Treatment Adherence in Outpatients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Critical Errors in Inhaler Technique Among Patients With Asthma and COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Real-World Setting.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Observational
- Air pollution, inhaled therapy and COPD exacerbations in Yunlin, Taiwan: a 2016-2024 single-centre retrospective cohort with environmental and carbon-footprint analyses.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Observational
- Assessment of peak inspiratory flow in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicentre, observational, prospective, real-life study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Observational
- Comparative In Vitro Deposition Analysis of Formoterol, Glycopyrronium, and Tiotropium Delivered via Capsule-Based DPI.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- The Impact of Case Management on Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
- Recalibrating Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Nebulizers versus Inhalers for Maintenance Therapy in COPD: Past as Prologue.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Review
- Validity and Reliability of the Vietnamese Version of the Inhaler Use Scale for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients.Thoracic research and practice · 2023Article
- Characteristics of Inhaler Technique in COPD Patients in a Specialized Center in Armenia, Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Packaging and Delivery of Asthma Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Inhaled medications are the main therapeutic treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and inhaler technique remained important that can increase medication efficacy, reducing dose and side effects. Poor inhaler technique is multi-factorial and the quality of inhaler technique has not previously assessed in Pakistan. We conducted a study to examine a range of competing factors that impact COPD patient willingness, practices, and preference in using their inhalers. Methods A cross-sectional of 765 patients with COPD were interviewed and assessed by qualitative questionnaires. Objective inhalation technique and steps assessment was performed; satisfaction, preferences, perception, and practice of different types of inhaler devices were evaluated at a single cross-sectional visit at the study enrolment. Results The study included 765 participants of mean age 58.7 years (SD ±7.8); 32% males and 68% females. Almost all of the females were exposed to biomass fuel smoke exposure (99%) and pipe (Huka) smokers 53%, while most male participants were cigarette smokers (92%). Only 6.3% of participants were able to perform correct steps of inhaler use, and few educated patients completed 7-steps. 66% of patients were using dry powder inhalers (DPI) inhaler devices and mostly performed the steps 1, 2, and 4 (98%) correctly, while 44% who were using metered-dose inhalers (MDI) completed only steps 2 and 4 correctly (88%). The majority of participants reported the particular inhaler devices was prescribed by the visiting consultants (54%). Interestingly, they were using two inhalers together (47%) relieving symptoms of dyspnea (83%) and cough (73%). The inhaler use technique was demonstrated to most of the patients by the pharmacy salesman (38.4%), while 15.8% reported that their doctors taught them the inhaler technique. 54.2% reported reason for poor adherence to inhaler use as they understand it might not work lately and 75.2% were not aware of any side effects associated with the regular use of an inhaler. Conclusions Poor inhaler technique is highly prevalent and the associated errors did not appear to be dependent on device type. Most of the participants had not receive proper training about the correct use and were not involved in decision making about the choice of inhaler device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.