Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101813›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

"Stop the Bleed" Education Assessment Tool (SBEAT): Development and Validation.

Jeffrey L Pellegrino, Nathan Charlton, Craig Goolsby

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07110077 (Implementing a Young First Aiders), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07110077 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Implementing a Young First Aiders (YoFA) Training Program Amongst Early Secondary School Children on Injury and Trauma First Aid in Fako Division.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BueaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled166ConditionsTrauma/Injury ProblemArmsYoung First Aiders Traing of Early Secondry School children
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can "Stop The Bleed" training courses for laypersons improve hemorrhage control knowledge, skills, and attitudes? A systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey L PellegrinoDisaster Science & Emergency Services, University of Akron, Akron, USA.
Nathan CharltonEmergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Craig GoolsbyMilitary & Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of the national Stop the Bleed campaign in the United States, more than a million people have received bleeding control training through the work of many organizations. These public and professional educational experiences are ideally grounded in health sciences, clinical, and educational evidence to be most effective. However, there is currently no standard tool for evaluating the educational quality of these programs. We developed and validated the Stop the Bleed Education Assessment Tool (SBEAT) to provide a standard measure of life-threatening bleeding educational programs knowledge learning outcomes to aid in evaluation and development of this public health program. The SBEAT development included medical, clinical, and educational experts to derive and validate learning outcomes. Specific item writing incorporated focus groups for input on language and then pilot testing before a full community pilot test established a data set, for which a Rasch methodology was applied. The resulting tool used 34 items embedded in 19 survey questions, with item separation statistic of 5.56 (0.97 reliability) and person separation statistic of 2.09 (0.81 reliability) for 171 persons. Overall, the Cronbach Alpha (KR-20) person score "test reliability" equaled 0.85 (SEM = 2.24). The SBEAT project establishes a standardized assessment tool to evaluate the cognitive aspects of first aid for life threatening bleeding. Comparison of outcomes from different teaching styles and methods will allow for the development of best practices for future bleeding control education and help organizations demonstrate value to learners, funders, and policy makers, and advance health sciences education. SBEAT offers a measure for which educational efficiency and efficacy can be judged within a larger effort to prepare people for personal emergencies or large-scale disasters.

Indexed as

competenciesdisaster response and preparednesseducationfirst aidlife-threatening bleedingmeasurement validationraschstop the bleedtourniquet

Identifiers

PMID33101813
PMCPMC7577301
OpenAlexW3087311640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.