Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101795›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Effectiveness of Iloprost in the Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema.

Hacı Bayram Tosun, Abuzer Uludağ, Sukru Demir, Sancar Serbest, Mehmet Mete Yasar, Kadir Öznam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone marrow edema of the hip: a narrative review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hacı Bayram TosunOrthopaedics, Medipol University, Istanbul, TUR.
Abuzer UludağOrthopaedics, Adiyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman, TUR.
Sukru DemirOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Fırat University, Elazıg, TUR.
Sancar SerbestOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, Kirikkale, TUR.
Mehmet Mete YasarOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Adıyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adıyaman, TUR.
Kadir ÖznamOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Medipol University School of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR.
Turan University · KZUniversity of Turin · ITKırıkkale University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective Bone marrow edema (BME) is a rare condition caused by insufficient osseous blood supply and may result in severe pain that has adverse effects on patients' life. To date, various conservative treatments have been recommended for the treatment of BME, including analgesics, immobilization of the affected extremity, and iloprost infusion. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effectiveness of parenteral iloprost therapy in the treatment of BME detected in different skeletal locations. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 23 patients (17 men and six women) with BME who were classified as stage I-III according to the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification. BME was localized to the proximal femur in 13 (56.5%), the distal femur in four (17.4%), tarsal bone in four (17.4%), and tibial plateau in two (8.7%) patients. The mean age of the patients was 46.7 years and all the patients were evaluated with the Visual Analog scale (VAS), Functional Mobility Scale (FMS), and MRI. Results A significant improvement was observed in the post-treatment VAS and FMS scores of all patients compared to their pre-treatment scores. Moreover, the edema regressed completely in 60.9% of the patients at three months of MRI control. No serious side effects were observed during the treatment in any of the patients. However, transient side effects including headache, arrhythmia, and flushing were observed in five patients. Conclusion The present study indicated that iloprost therapy is an effective and safe option in the treatment of BME patients, particularly in the reduction of severe pain that has adverse effects on patients' social life, regardless of ARCO staging. Moreover, this therapy could be particularly useful in reducing pain, improving functional recovery, and achieving complete regression of the edema on MRI in ARCO stage I-II patients.

Indexed as

bone marrow edemailoprosttreatment

Identifiers

PMID33101795
PMCPMC7575317
OpenAlexW3087352012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.