Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101625›Full record

ReviewFrontline gastroenterology2020

How to manage IBD in the 'elderly'.

Jonathan P Segal, Hein Myat Thu Htet, Jimmy Limdi, Bu'Hussain Hayee

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontline gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Special Populations-IBD in Seniors.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  8. A review of the therapeutic management of Crohn's disease.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Frailty in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan P SegalDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital, Watford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-0316
Hein Myat Thu HtetGastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK.
Jimmy LimdiSection of IBD, Division of Gastroenterology, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Bu'Hussain HayeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1670-8815
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBKing's College Hospital · GBPennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt Mark's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) rises and the global population ages, the number of older people living with these conditions will inevitably increase. The challenges posed by comorbid conditions, polypharmacy, the unintended consequences of long-term treatment and the real but often underestimated mismatch between chronological and biological ages underpin management. Significantly, there may be differences in disease characteristics, presentation and management of an older patient with IBD, together with other unique challenges. Importantly, clinical trials often exclude older patients, so treatment decisions are frequently pragmatic, extrapolated from a number of sources of evidence and perhaps primarily dictated by concerns around adverse effects. This review aimed to discuss the epidemiology, clinical features and considerations with management in older patients with IBD.

Indexed as

crohn's diseaseelderlyIBDulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID33101625
PMCPMC7569512
OpenAlexW2987384518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.