ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2020
Functional-pathway-dominant contrast adaptation and sensitization in mouse retinal ganglion cells.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- GABA receptors mediate adaptation and sensitization processes in mouse retinal ganglion cells.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Visual surround suppression at the neural and perceptual levels.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) reduce their light sensitivity during persistent high-contrast stimulation to prevent saturation to strong inputs and improve coding efficiency. This process is known as contrast adaptation. However, contrast adaptation also reduces RGCs' light response to weak inputs. On the other hand, some RGCs undergo contrast sensitization, and these RGCs respond to weak inputs following high contrast stimulation. In the present study, multi-electrode recordings were conducted on isolated mouse retinas under full-field visual stimulation with different contrast levels. Adaptation and sensitization were mainly observed in OFF and ON pathways, respectively. The results of linear-nonlinear analysis and stimulus reconstruction revealed that both the light sensitivity and encoded information were changed in opposite directions in adaptation and sensitization processes. Our work suggests that contrast adaptation and sensitization are two opposite dynamic processes. In mouse retina, OFF RGCs utilize adaptation to increase the discrimination of strong OFF inputs. On the other hand, ON RGCs use sensitization to increase the sensitivity to weak ON inputs. This functional differentiation might be meaningful for the mouse's survival as it lives in environments in which strong OFF stimuli often indicate potential predators while weak ON stimuli are usually related to movement and might be important for predation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.