Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101529›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2020

Functional-pathway-dominant contrast adaptation and sensitization in mouse retinal ganglion cells.

Min Dai, Pei-Ji Liang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Min DaiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dong-Chuan Road, Shanghai, 200240 China.
Pei-Ji LiangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dong-Chuan Road, Shanghai, 200240 China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) reduce their light sensitivity during persistent high-contrast stimulation to prevent saturation to strong inputs and improve coding efficiency. This process is known as contrast adaptation. However, contrast adaptation also reduces RGCs' light response to weak inputs. On the other hand, some RGCs undergo contrast sensitization, and these RGCs respond to weak inputs following high contrast stimulation. In the present study, multi-electrode recordings were conducted on isolated mouse retinas under full-field visual stimulation with different contrast levels. Adaptation and sensitization were mainly observed in OFF and ON pathways, respectively. The results of linear-nonlinear analysis and stimulus reconstruction revealed that both the light sensitivity and encoded information were changed in opposite directions in adaptation and sensitization processes. Our work suggests that contrast adaptation and sensitization are two opposite dynamic processes. In mouse retina, OFF RGCs utilize adaptation to increase the discrimination of strong OFF inputs. On the other hand, ON RGCs use sensitization to increase the sensitivity to weak ON inputs. This functional differentiation might be meaningful for the mouse's survival as it lives in environments in which strong OFF stimuli often indicate potential predators while weak ON stimuli are usually related to movement and might be important for predation.

Indexed as

Linear–nonlinear modelMulti-electrode recordingRetinal ganglion cellsStimulus reconstructionVisual information

Identifiers

PMID33101529
PMCPMC7568754
OpenAlexW3088533788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.