Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101496›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

A gut butyrate-producing bacterium

Shih-Chang Chang, Ming-Hung Shen, Chih-Yi Liu, Chi-Ming Pu, Je-Ming Hu, Chi-Jung Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Tanshinones fromActa biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2026
    Article
  6. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shih-Chang ChangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei 10630, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Ming-Hung ShenDepartment of Surgery, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City 24352, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chih-Yi LiuDepartment of Pathology, Sijhih Cathay General Hospital, New Taipei City 22174, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chi-Ming PuDivision of Plastic Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei 10630, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Je-Ming HuDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 11490, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chi-Jung HuangSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Cathay General Hospital · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbes influence tumor development and progression in the intestines and may provide a novel paradigm for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Gut dysbiosis may be associated with the development and progression of CRC. Identifying the interactions between the colonic tract and gut microbiota may provide novel information relevant to CRC prevention. The present study examined the effects of butyrate-producing

Indexed as

1,2-dimethylhydrazinebutyrateButyricicoccus pullicaecorumcolorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID33101496
PMCPMC7577080
OpenAlexW3092547721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.