ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020
Influence of unilateral intravitreal bevacizumab injection on the incidence of symptomatic choroidal neovascularization in the fellow eye in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (Review).
Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-Term Efficacy of Two-Step Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity in a Japanese Cohort: Anti-VEGF Therapy Followed by Routine Laser Photocoagulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Factors affecting prognosis and need for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in wet age-related macular degeneration.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Surgical Treatment in Silicone Oil-Associated Glaucoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Adherence to Therapy in Glaucoma Treatment-A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Systemic Inflammation Associated with Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in Persons Living with HIV.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- OCT Biomarkers in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Narrative Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (neovascular ARMD) represents only 10% of ARMD cases but is responsible, if untreated, for quick and severe central vision loss due to major macular changes. The presence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in one eye is associated with an approximately 10% risk of CNV development in the fellow eye each year. Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy has quickly evolved as the standard treatment in neovascular ARMD in the last decade due to significant anatomical and functional improvements, especially in the early stages. In many reports an improvement in the untreated fellow eye was mentioned and systemic exposure was soon confirmed for all anti-VEGF agents after unilateral intravitreal injection. In particular, bevacizumab intravitreal injection is followed by a consistent reduction of serum VEGF levels and the drug was shown to have the longest serum half-life raising important debates about its safety. Once bevacizumab was detected in the fellow eye of an animal model after unilateral injection, the possible influence on fellow eye conversion rate into neovascular ARMD was questioned. Although comparative studies have not found statistically significant differences between drugs regarding the incidence of symptomatic CNV in the fellow eye during treatment, we observed, on a retrospective 36-month evaluation, a reduced incidence of symptomatic CNV in the fellow eye that might be explained by the consistent systemic exposure of bevacizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.