ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2021
New methodology for repetitive sequences identification in
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational tools for tandem repeat detection using long-read sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Dose-dependent role of AMH and AMHR2 signaling in male differentiation and regulation of sex determination in Spotted knifejaw (Oplegnathus punctatus) with XCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
- Repetitive DNA sequence detection and its role in the human genome.Communications biology · 2023Review
- Intelligent system based comparative analysis study of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and antigenic proteins in different types of vaccines.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repetitive DNA sequences occupy the major proportion of DNA in the human genome and even in the other species' genomes. The importance of each repetitive DNA type depends on many factors: structural and functional roles, positions, lengths and numbers of these repetitions are clear examples. Conserving such DNA sequences or not in different locations in the chromosome remains a challenge for researchers in biology. Detecting their location despite their great variability and finding novel repetitive sequences remains a challenging task. To side-step this problem, we developed a new method based on signal and image processing tools. In fact, using this method we could find repetitive patterns in DNA images regardless of the repetition length. This new technique seems to be more efficient in detecting new repetitive sequences than bioinformatics tools. In fact, the classical tools present limited performances especially in case of mutations (insertion or deletion). However, modifying one or a few numbers of pixels in the image doesn't affect the global form of the repetitive pattern. As a consequence, we generated a new repetitive patterns database which contains tandem and dispersed repeated sequences. The highly repetitive sequences, we have identified in X and Y chromosomes, are shown to be located in other human chromosomes or in other genomes. The data we have generated is then taken as input to a Convolutional neural network classifier in order to classify them. The system we have constructed is efficient and gives an average of 94.4% as recognition score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.