Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101371›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

PacBio Long Reads Improve Metagenomic Assemblies, Gene Catalogs, and Genome Binning.

Haiying Xie, Caiyun Yang, Yamin Sun, Yasuo Igarashi, Tao Jin, Feng Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing: new horizons in microbiology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Sample and Library Preparation for PacBio Long-Read Sequencing in Grapevine.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biosynthetic Potential ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haiying XieResearch Center of Bioenergy and Bioremediation, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Caiyun YangResearch Center of Bioenergy and Bioremediation, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Yamin SunResearch Center for Functional Genomics and Biochip, Tianjin Biochip Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China.
Yasuo IgarashiResearch Center of Bioenergy and Bioremediation, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Tao JinThe Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI)-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Feng LuoResearch Center of Bioenergy and Bioremediation, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PacBio long reads sequencing presents several potential advantages for DNA assembly, including being able to provide more complete gene profiling of metagenomic samples. However, lower single-pass accuracy can make gene discovery and assembly for low-abundance organisms difficult. To evaluate the application and performance of PacBio long reads and Illumina HiSeq short reads in metagenomic analyses, we directly compared various assemblies involving PacBio and Illumina sequencing reads based on two anaerobic digestion microbiome samples from a biogas fermenter. Using a PacBio platform, 1.58 million long reads (19.6 Gb) were produced with an average length of 7,604 bp. Using an Illumina HiSeq platform, 151.2 million read pairs (45.4 Gb) were produced. Hybrid assemblies using PacBio long reads and HiSeq contigs produced improvements in assembly statistics, including an increase in the average contig length, contig N50 size, and number of large contigs. Interestingly, depth-based hybrid assemblies generated a higher percentage of complete genes (98.86%) compared to those based on HiSeq contigs only (40.29%), because the PacBio reads were long enough to cover many repeating short elements and capture multiple genes in a single read. Additionally, the incorporation of PacBio long reads led to considerable advantages regarding reducing contig numbers and increasing the completeness of the genome reconstruction, which was poorly assembled and binned when using HiSeq data alone. From this comparison of PacBio long reads with Illumina HiSeq short reads related to complex microbiome samples, we conclude that PacBio long reads can produce longer contigs, more complete genes, and better genome binning, thereby offering more information about metagenomic samples.

Indexed as

anaerobic digestiongene cataloggenome reconstructionhybrid assemblyPacBio

Identifiers

PMID33101371
PMCPMC7506068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.