Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101354›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

Conservation Genomics of a Threatened

Detuan Liu, Lu Zhang, Jihua Wang, Yongpeng Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Does the critically endangeredPlant diversity · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Phylogeographic structure ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  17. Genetic diversity and structure ofPlant diversity · 2021
    Article
  18. Plant diversity · 2021
    Article
  19. Conservation Genomics of Wild Red Sage (Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  20. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Detuan LiuYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
Lu ZhangFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Kunming, China.
Jihua WangFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Kunming, China.
Yongpeng MaYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
Kunming Institute of Botany · CNYunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though it is well-acknowledged that next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can provide further insights into plant conservation management than traditional molecular markers, studies employing NGS to address conservation genomics and subsequent conservation strategies for threatened plants are still rare.

Indexed as

conservationddRAD-seqgenetic diversitypopulation demographyRhododendron cyanocarpum

Identifiers

PMID33101354
PMCPMC7500208
OpenAlexW3083358426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.