Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Accelerating Automated Stomata Analysis Through Simplified Sample Collection and Imaging Techniques.

Luke Millstead, Hiranya Jayakody, Harsh Patel, Vihaan Kaura, Paul R Petrie, Florence Tomasetig, Mark Whitty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stomatal pore width and area measurements inmicroPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luke MillsteadSchool of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hiranya JayakodySchool of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Harsh PatelSchool of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Vihaan KauraSchool of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Paul R PetrieSchool of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Florence TomasetigMark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark WhittySchool of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUSouth Australian Research and Development Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital image processing is commonly used in plant health and growth analysis, aiming to improve research efficiency and repeatability. One focus is analysing the morphology of stomata, with the aim to better understand the regulation of gas exchange, its link to photosynthesis and water use and how they are influenced by climatic conditions. Despite the key role played by these cells, their microscopic analysis is largely manual, requiring intricate sample collection, laborious microscope application and the manual operation of a graphical user interface to identify and measure stomata. This research proposes a simple, end-to-end solution which enables automatic analysis of stomata by introducing key changes to imaging techniques, stomata detection as well as stomatal pore area calculation. An optimal procedure was developed for sample collection and imaging by investigating the suitability of using an automatic microscope slide scanner to image nail polish imprints. The use of the slide scanner allows the rapid collection of high-quality images from entire samples with minimal manual effort. A convolutional neural network was used to automatically detect stomata in the input image, achieving average precision, recall and F-score values of 0.79, 0.85, and 0.82 across four plant species. A novel binary segmentation and stomatal cross section analysis method is developed to estimate the pore boundary and calculate the associated area. The pore estimation algorithm correctly identifies stomata pores 73.72% of the time. Ultimately, this research presents a fast and simplified method of stomatal assay generation requiring minimal human intervention, enhancing the speed of acquiring plant health information.

Indexed as

high-throughput analysismicroscope imagerystomata analysis pipelinestomata pore measurementstomata sample collection

Identifiers

PMID33101348
PMCPMC7546325
OpenAlexW3088750230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.