Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101330›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Understanding the Impact of Cultivar, Seed Origin, and Substrate on Bacterial Diversity of the Sugar Beet Rhizosphere and Suppression of Soil-Borne Pathogens.

Adrian Wolfgang, Christin Zachow, Henry Müller, Alfred Grand, Nora Temme, Ralf Tilcher, Gabriele Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrian WolfgangAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (ACIB GmbH), Graz, Austria.
Christin ZachowAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (ACIB GmbH), Graz, Austria.
Henry MüllerInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Alfred GrandVERMIGRAND Naturprodukte GmbH, Absdorf, Austria.
Nora TemmeKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Einbeck, Germany.
Ralf TilcherKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Einbeck, Germany.
Gabriele BergInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (Austria) · ATGraz University of Technology · ATKWS Saat (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rhizosphere microbiome is crucial for plant health, especially for preventing roots from being infected by soil-borne pathogens. Microbiota-mediated pathogen response in the soil-root interface may hold the key for microbiome-based control strategies of phytopathogens. We studied the pathosystem sugar beet-late sugar beet root rot caused by

Indexed as

biocontrolbreedingPseudomonas poae RE*1-1-14root microbiomeseed microbiomesugar beet cultivarsvermicompost

Identifiers

PMID33101330
PMCPMC7554574
OpenAlexW3089488452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.