Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33101004›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2020

Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America.

Nilton Custodio, Lissette Duque, Rosa Montesinos, Carlos Alva-Diaz, Martin Mellado, Andrea Slachevsky

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Is There Anything Else?": Examining Administrator Influence on Linguistic Features from the Cookie Theft Picture Description Cognitive Test.... Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics. Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nilton CustodioResearch Unit, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Peru.
Lissette DuqueNeuromedicenter Adult Day Care Center, Quito, Ecuador.
Rosa MontesinosResearch Unit, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Peru.
Carlos Alva-DiazFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
Martin MelladoNeuropsychology and Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory (LANNEC), Physiopathology Department, ICBM, Neurosciences and East Neuroscience Departments, University of Chile School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile.
Andrea SlachevskyNeuropsychology and Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory (LANNEC), Physiopathology Department, ICBM, Neurosciences and East Neuroscience Departments, University of Chile School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile.
Institute of Peruvian Studies · PECenter for Climate and Resilience Research · CLUniversidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasecognitive screeningdementiaLatin Americamild cognitive impairmentMoCA

Identifiers

PMID33101004
PMCPMC7500065
OpenAlexW3083163969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.