Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33100959›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

BCIAUT-P300: A Multi-Session and Multi-Subject Benchmark Dataset on Autism for P300-Based Brain-Computer-Interfaces.

Marco Simões, Davide Borra, Eduardo Santamaría-Vázquez, GBT-UPM, Mayra Bittencourt-Villalpando, Dominik Krzemiński, Aleksandar Miladinović, Neural_Engineering_Group, Thomas Schmid, Haifeng Zhao and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Marco SimõesCoimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Davide BorraDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" (DEI), University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy.
Eduardo Santamaría-VázquezGrupo de Ingeniería Biomédica, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
GBT-UPM
Mayra Bittencourt-VillalpandoDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Dominik KrzemińskiCUBRIC, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Aleksandar MiladinovićDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Neural_Engineering_Group
Thomas SchmidMachine Learning Group, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Haifeng ZhaoThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Carlos AmaralCoimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Bruno DireitoCoimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Jorge HenriquesCentre for Informatics and Systems (CISUC), Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Paulo CarvalhoCentre for Informatics and Systems (CISUC), Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel Castelo-BrancoCoimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
University of Coimbra · PTThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Trieste · ITLaboratori Guglielmo Marconi (Italy) · ITUniversidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of multi-session P300 datasets for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI). Publicly available datasets are usually limited by small number of participants with few BCI sessions. In this sense, the lack of large, comprehensive datasets with various individuals and multiple sessions has limited advances in the development of more effective data processing and analysis methods for BCI systems. This is particularly evident to explore the feasibility of deep learning methods that require large datasets. Here we present the BCIAUT-P300 dataset, containing 15 autism spectrum disorder individuals undergoing 7 sessions of P300-based BCI joint-attention training, for a total of 105 sessions. The dataset was used for the 2019 IFMBE Scientific Challenge organized during MEDICON 2019 where, in two phases, teams from all over the world tried to achieve the best possible object-detection accuracy based on the P300 signals. This paper presents the characteristics of the dataset and the approaches followed by the 9 finalist teams during the competition. The winner obtained an average accuracy of 92.3% with a convolutional neural network based on EEGNet. The dataset is now publicly released and stands as a benchmark for future P300-based BCI algorithms based on multiple session data.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderbenchmark datasetbrain-computer interfaceEEGmulti-sessionmulti-subjectP300

Identifiers

PMID33100959
PMCPMC7556208
OpenAlexW3087333144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.