Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33100946›Full record

ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2020

Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction - early complications and outcomes of the treatment.

Artur Bocian, Piotr Kędzierawski, Krzysztof Kurczych, Przemysław Jasnowski, Daniel Maliszewski, Agnieszka Kołacińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Artur BocianDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Holycross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland.
Piotr KędzierawskiInstitute of the Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Krzysztof KurczychDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Holycross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland.
Przemysław JasnowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology with Sub-unit for the Treatment of Breast Diseases, The Holy Virgin Mary Provincial Specialist Hospital, Częstochowa, Poland.
Daniel MaliszewskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Janusz Korczak Provincial Specialist Hospital, Słupsk, Poland.
Agnieszka KołacińskaDepartment of Head and Neck Cancer Surgery, Breast Cancer Unit, Medical University of Łódź, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyTo assess the early complications and outcomes of the treatment of patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective study was performed on 120 patients who underwent 130 NSM (10 bilateral) procedures between 1.01.2015 and 31.12.2017 in two oncology centers in Poland. In 80 patients a breast cancer was recognized. Sixteen patients underwent operations on the basis of being carriers of the

resultsThe patients for risk-reducing mastectomies were younger. Prevalent histology was no special type (NST) in 60 out of 80 patients, mean tumor - NAC distance was 43.3 mm. The prevalent biological subtype was Luminal B HER2-negative. Adjuvant management consisted of chemotherapy in 61 and radiotherapy in 35 patients. We noted 14 cases of complications, 13 in the cancer group, and 1 in the non-cancer group. Skin necrosis was the most common. The mean time for the appearance of the complications was 2.8 months. No local recurrences were observed.

conclusionsNSM is a safe and effective surgical option for qualified patients with breast cancer and in risk-reducing mastectomies.

Indexed as

BRCA1breast cancerimmediate breast reconstructionsubcutaneous mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID33100946
PMCPMC7573339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.