ArticleComputing And Visualization In Science2019
NeuroBox: Computational Mathematics in Multiscale Neuroscience.
Article in Computing And Visualization In Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Density Visualization Pipeline: A Tool for Cellular and Network Density Visualization and Analysis.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The brain is a complex organ operating on multiple scales. From molecular events that inform electrical and biochemical cellular responses, the brain interconnects processes all the way up to the massive network size of billions of brain cells. This strongly coupled, nonlinear, system has been subject to research that has turned increasingly multidisciplinary. The seminal work of Hodgkin and Huxley in the 1950s made use of experimental data to derive a coherent physical model of electrical signaling in neurons, which can be solved using mathematical and computational methods, thus bringing together neuroscience, physics, mathematics, and computer science. Over the last decades numerous projects have been dedicated to modeling and simulation of specific parts of molecular dynamics, neuronal signaling, and neural network behavior. Simulators have been developed around a specific objective and scale, in order to cope with the underlying computational complexity. Often times a dimension reduction approach allows larger scale simulations, this however has the inherent drawback of losing insight into structure-function interplay at the cellular level. This paper gives an overview of the project NeuroBox that has the objective of integrating multiple brain scales and associated physical models into one unified framework. NeuroBox hosts geometry and anatomical reconstruction methods, such that detailed three-dimensional domains can be integrated into numerical simulations of models based on partial differential equations. The project further focusses on deriving numerical methods for handling complex computational domains, and to couple multiple spatial dimensions. The latter allows the user to specify in which parts of the biological problem high-dimensional representations are necessary and where low-dimensional approximations are acceptable. NeuroBox offers workflow user interfaces that are automatically generated with VRL-Studio and can be controlled by non-experts. The project further uses uG4 as the numerical backend, and therefore accesses highly advanced discretization methods as well as hierarchical and scalable numerical solvers for very large neurobiological problems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.