Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33100842›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2020

Evaluation of hysterosalpingographic findings among patients presenting with infertility.

Hind Toufig, Tarek Benameur, Mohammed-Elfatih Twfieg, Hiba Omer, Tamara El-Musharaf

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hind ToufigCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Tarek BenameurCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed-Elfatih TwfiegCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Hiba OmerDepartment of Basic Sciences, Deanship of Preparatory Year, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.
Tamara El-MusharafDepartment of English Language, Deanship of Preparatory Year, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal University · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfertility is a global health issue and hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a valuable radiological tool in infertility workup and remains a main modality for investigating female infertility. However, the HSG findings of infertility are not the same worldwide.This study aimed at evaluating the incidence of HSG findings in patients investigated for primary and secondary infertility, correlating these findings with their clinical data that reflect the infertility causes and comparing the findings with previous international studies.

methodsA prospective descriptive study of 75 female patients referred, as cases of infertility, for HSG examination in Elrebat Hospital and Khartoum Advanced Diagnostic Center. HSG was performed in the first half of the cycle. The procedure and its complications, were explained to the patients and informed consents were obtained. Patients with active pelvic infection and active uterine or vaginal bleeding were excluded from the study. Using aseptic technique and with proper patient's positioning, iodinated contrast was introduced into the cervix under fluoroscopic monitoring, to demonstrate the uterine cavity, fallopian tubes and free spillage into the peritoneal cavity. Personal data, clinical data and HSG findings were analyzed using SPSS version 23.

resultsThe commonest age group seen was 26-36 years. Close incidences of primary and secondary infertility were detected. 52.7% had abnormal findings in HSG. Tubal pathology (42.7%) being the most common abnormality, followed by uterine and combined abnormalities. There was strong association between past medical history suggesting pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) or past history suggesting tubal blockage secondary to abdominopelvic surgery and tubal abnormalities.

conclusionHSG examinations revealed that the most common abnormality was tubal blockage possibly complicating PID and abdominopelvic surgeries. This reflects the HSG diagnostic and therapeutic role in the assessment of female infertility and the further needs for more preventive measures targeting the reduction of tubal pathologies in developing countries.

Indexed as

Abdominopelvic surgeryHysterosalpingographyInfertilityPelvic inflammatory diseaseTubal blockage

Identifiers

PMID33100842
PMCPMC7569106
OpenAlexW3082676039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.