Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33100742›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics

Management of vasopressor induced ischemia.

Michael Livesey, Julio J Jauregui, Max C Hamaker, Raymond A Pensy, Christopher G Langhammer, W Andrew Eglseder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intrathecal nicardipine for symptomatic, refractory vasospasm treatment in pediatric patients: a case series.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael LiveseyUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USA.
Julio J JaureguiUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USA.
Max C HamakerUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USA.
Raymond A PensyUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USA.
Christopher G LanghammerUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USA.
W Andrew EglsederUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated a cohort of patients who developed vasopressor-induced limb ischemia and the management options to prevent progression or minimize morbidity of digital necrosis.

methodsWe reviewed all current literature on pressor-induced limb ischemia and report options for the management of patients requiring vasopressors who developed limb ischemia. We then retrospectively reviewed presentation, treatment, and short-term outcomes for patients at our tertiary referral academic medical center that developed this complication. Finally, we recommend guidelines for the tiered management of these complex patients.

resultsThirty-six patients were included. Twenty-six patients (72%) required resuscitation with more than one vasopressor. Vasopressors were initiated for septic-shock (52.7%), cardiogenic-shock (16.7%), hypovolemic-shock (13.9%), acute transplant rejection (13.9%), and neurogenic-shock (2.8%). According to the tiered management recommendations, patients were managed with phase 1 care (19%), phase 2 care (8.3%), phase 3 care (50%) or phase 4 care (5.6%). The patient expired in the acute setting in 13.9% of cases.

conclusionLife-saving vasopressors risk digital ischemia and necrosis. Early recognition, reporting, and treatment of this complication are important in minimizing morbidity. Using a tiered approach helps organize the healthcare team's management of this iatrogenic complication while respecting the treatment paradigm of "life over limb," and may be safely performed with acceptable outcomes.

Indexed as

Limb ischemiaLimb necrosisVasopressor induced necrosis

Identifiers

PMID33100742
PMCPMC7577194
OpenAlexW3094237838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.