ArticleAerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research2020
Assessment and Validation of a Hygroscopic Growth Model with Different Water Activity Estimation Methods.
Article in Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reinventing Cloth Masks in the Face of Pandemics.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hygroscopic growth models are currently of interest as aids for targeting the deposition of inhaled drug particles in preferred areas of the lung that will maximize their pharmaceutical effect. Mathematical models derived to estimate hygroscopic growth over time have been previously developed but have not been thoroughly validated. For this study, model validation involved a comparison of modeled values to measured values when the growing droplet had reached equilibrium. A second validation process utilized a novel system to measure the growth of a droplet on a microscope coverslip relative to modeled values when the droplet is undergoing the initial rapid growth phase. Various methods currently used to estimate the water activity of the growing droplet, which influences the droplet growth rate, were also compared. Results indicated that a form of the hygroscopic growth model that utilizes coupled-differential equations to estimate droplet diameter and temperature over time was valid throughout droplet growth until it reached its equilibrium size. Accuracy was enhanced with the use of a polynomial expression to estimate water activity relative to the use of a simplified estimate of water activity based on Raoult's Law. Model accuracy was also improved when constraining the film of salt solution surrounding the dissolving salt core at saturation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.