Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33100377›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental social psychology2021

Evidence against subliminal anchoring: Two close, highly powered, preregistered, and failed replication attempts.

Lukas Röseler, Astrid Schütz, Pia A Blank, Marieluisa Dück, Sabine Fels, Jana Kupfer, Linda Scheelje, Christian Seida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental social psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lukas RöselerUniversity of Bamberg, Germany.
Astrid SchützUniversity of Bamberg, Germany.
Pia A BlankUniversity of Bamberg, Germany.
Marieluisa DückUniversity of Bamberg, Germany.
Sabine FelsUniversity of Bamberg, Germany.
Jana KupferUniversity of Bamberg, Germany.
Linda ScheeljeUniversity of Bamberg, Germany.
Christian SeidaUniversity of Bamberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•The only two published studies on subliminal anchoring report contradictory results.•In two replications of these studies we could not find any evidence for subliminal anchoring.•Replications were as close as possible and high data quality was ensured, for example by introducing new manipulation checks.•Both our studies feature entirely open materials and preregistration of all materials including the analysis scripts. OPEN SCIENCE BADGES: Please grant all three badges, Preregistration, Open Materials, and Open Data.

Identifiers

PMID33100377
PMCPMC7567524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.