Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33099993›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2021

Traditional and New Methods of Bone Age Assessment-An Overview

Monika Prokop-Piotrkowska, Kamila Marszałek-Dziuba, Elżbieta Moszczyńska, Mieczysław Szalecki, Elżbieta Jurkiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monika Prokop-PiotrkowskaChildren’s Memorial Health Institute, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Warsaw, PolandORCID 0000-0003-3323-6784
Kamila Marszałek-DziubaChildren’s Memorial Health Institute, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Warsaw, PolandORCID 0000-0003-2573-8311
Elżbieta MoszczyńskaChildren’s Memorial Health Institute, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Warsaw, PolandORCID 0000-0002-1683-7003
Mieczysław SzaleckiJan Kochanowski University, Collegium Medicum, Kielce, PolandORCID 0000-0002-2950-761X
Elżbieta JurkiewiczChildren’s Memorial Health Institute, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warsaw, PolandORCID 0000-0003-4505-8815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone age is one of biological indicators of maturity used in clinical practice and it is a very important parameter of a child’s assessment, especially in paediatric endocrinology. The most widely used method of bone age assessment is by performing a hand and wrist radiograph and its analysis with Greulich-Pyle or Tanner-Whitehouse atlases, although it has been about 60 years since they were published. Due to the progress in the area of Computer-Aided Diagnosis and application of artificial intelligence in medicine, lately, numerous programs for automatic bone age assessment have been created. Most of them have been verified in clinical studies in comparison to traditional methods, showing good precision while eliminating inter- and intra-rater variability and significantly reducing the time of assessment. Additionally, there are available methods for assessment of bone age which avoid X-ray exposure, using modalities such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentAge Determination by SkeletonChild DevelopmentDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAge FactorsAutomationChildChild, PreschoolDeep LearningFemaleHand BonesHumansInfantchildrendeep learningMaturationneural networksradiographs

Identifiers

PMID33099993
PMCPMC8388057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.