Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33099898›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2020

nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV in post-gemcitabine metastatic pancreatic cancer: Randomized phase 2 trial in Japanese patients.

Makoto Ueno, Shoji Nakamori, Kazuya Sugimori, Masashi Kanai, Masafumi Ikeda, Masato Ozaka, Masayuki Furukawa, Takuji Okusaka, Ken Kawabe, Junji Furuse and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02697058 (Phase II Randomized Study of BAX2398 in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Calcium Levofolinate in Japanese Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Which Progressed or Recurred After Prior Gemcitabine-Based Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02697058 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Randomized Study of BAX2398 in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Calcium Levofolinate in Japanese Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Which Progressed or Recurred After Prior Gemcitabine-Based Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de Recherches Internationales ServierRan2016 to 2018Enrolled84ConditionsMetastatic Pancreatic CancerArmsBAX2398 + 5-FU/calcium levofolinate, 5-FU/calcium levofolinate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Makoto UenoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4480-0029
Shoji NakamoriDepartment of Surgery, NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuya SugimoriGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masashi KanaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Masafumi IkedaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Masato OzakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki FurukawaDepartment of Hepatic-biliary-pancreatology, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takuji OkusakaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken KawabeDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Junji FuruseFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0663-6117
Yoshito KomatsuDepartment of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hiroshi IshiiClinical Research Center, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Atsushi SatoDepartment of Oncology, Hirosaki University Hospital, Aomori, Japan.
Satoshi ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Priti ChughServier Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA.
Rui TangServier Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA.
Tatsuya IokaDepartment of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Chiba Cancer Center · JPHirosaki University Hospital · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKyorin University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPKyushu University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the NAPOLI-1 phase 3 trial, liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) +5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) significantly increased mPFS versus 5-FU/LV (3.1 vs. 1.5 months [unstratified HR = 0.56, p = 0.0001]) in patients with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine-based therapy. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated nal-IRI+5-FU/LV tolerability (Part 1), safety, and efficacy (Part 2; outcomes reported here) in Japanese patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

methodsPatients were randomized 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs. ≥90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dl vs. <4.0 g/dl). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA19-9 response, and QoL. The ITT population comprised all randomized patients.

resultsPatient characteristics differed between nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 40) and 5-FU/LV (n = 39) arms, including baseline hepatic lesions (63% vs. 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs. 51%), and post-study anticancer therapy (55% vs. 72%). Investigator-assessed mPFS increase with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant versus 5-FU/LV (2.7 vs. 1.5 months, HR = 0.60). Independently assessed mPFS showed similar trends (1.7 vs. 1.6 months, HR = 0.79). mOS was 6.3 months with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and not reached with 5-FU/LV. ORR increased significantly with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV (18% vs. 0, rate difference 17.5). Commonly reported grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs. 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs. 0), and diarrhea (17% vs. 3%).

conclusionsIn conclusion, clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator-assessed PFS and ORR were observed with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02697058).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansIrinotecanJapanLeucovorinLiposomesMaleMiddle AgedDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinLiposomeschemotherapyclinical trialsmedical oncologypancreatic cancerpancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33099898
PMCPMC7774735
OpenAlexW3094433291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.