ArticleAmerican journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989)2021
Prospective association of maternal immune pro-inflammatory responsivity and regulation in pregnancy with length of gestation.
Article in American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a novel nomogram to predict the prognosis of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Enduring impact of childhood adversity: Affective modulation of acoustic startle response during pregnancy and postpartum.Physiology & behavior · 2023Article
- Women's quality of sleep and in vitro fertilization success.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Change of pace: How developmental tempo varies to accommodate failed provision of early needs.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
problemThe immune system represents a leading pathway of interest in the pathophysiology of preterm birth. The majority of human clinical studies interrogating this pathway have utilized circulating immune biomarkers; however, these concentrations typically reflect only basal production but not key functional properties of the immune system, particularly variation in the pro-inflammatory response to antigen challenge and the regulation of this response. Thus, in this study, we utilized an ex vivo stimulation protocol that quantifies these processes, and we examined their prospective association with the gestation length and risk of preterm birth. METHOD OF STUDY: Immune responsiveness and regulation were assessed in 128 pregnant women in mid-gestation using an ex vivo stimulation protocol. Maternal pro-inflammatory responsivity of leukocytes was quantified by assessing the release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β in response to antigen stimulation, and regulation of the pro-inflammatory response was quantified by assessing the suppression of stimulated cytokine response upon co-incubation with increasing dexamethasone concentrations (ie, glucocorticoid receptor resistance; GRR).
resultsHigher maternal GRR, indicating impaired regulation of the pro-inflammatory response, was significantly and independently associated with shorter gestational length (β = -0.42, p = .0091) and a 3.0-fold increase in risk for preterm birth (OR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.17-7.70, p = .0218). Basal circulating IL-6 and TNF-α were not associated with either outcome.
conclusionThe association of maternal GRR with length of gestation and preterm birth risk suggests that the processes represented by this measure-maternal pro-inflammatory propensity and immune regulation-may provide further mechanistic insight into the pathophysiology of preterm birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.