Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33099710›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Validity of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire among the general population of Poland.

Katarzyna Młyńczak, Dominik Golicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. EQ-5D-5L Values and Determinants for a Vietnamese Population.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A comparative study of Chinese medicine quality of life assessment scale (CQ-11D) and EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D scales based on Chinese population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A head-to-head comparison of the measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in Chinese family caregivers of cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly Europeans: a secondary data analysis using SHARE(d) data.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarzyna MłyńczakDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1b Banacha St, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland. mlynczak.kasia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0877-5623
Dominik GolickiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1b Banacha St, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7741-4760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aim to compare the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire with the EQ-5D-3L version and EQ VAS, based on a survey conducted in a sample representing the general adult population of Poland.

methodsThe survey comprised health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires: EQ-5D-5L, EQ VAS, SF-12 and EQ-5D-3L, together with demographic and socio-economic characteristics items. The EQ-5D index values were estimated based on a directly measured value set for Poland. The following psychometric properties were analysed: feasibility, distribution of responses, redistribution from EQ-5D-3L to EQ-5D-5L, inconsistencies, ceiling effects, informativity power and construct validity. We proposed a novel approach to the construct validity assessment, based on the use of a machine learning technique known as the random forest algorithm.

resultsFrom March to June 2014, 3978 subjects (aged 18-87, 53.2% female) were surveyed. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire had a lower ceiling effect compared to EQ-5D-3L (38.0% vs 46.6%). Redistribution from EQ-5D-3L to EQ-5D-5L was similar for each dimension, and the mean inconsistency did not exceed 5%. The results of known-groups validation confirmed the hypothesis concerning the relationship between the EQ-5D index values and age, sex and occurrence of diabetes.

conclusionsThe EQ-5D-5L, in comparison with its EQ-5D-3L equivalent, showed similar or better psychometric properties within the general population of a country. We assessed the construct validity of the questionnaire with a novel approach that was based on a machine learning technique known as the random forest algorithm.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEQ-5DEQ-5D-3LEQ-5D-5LGeneral populationHealth-related quality of lifeValidity

Identifiers

PMID33099710
PMCPMC7952292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.