Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33099648›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021

Intravenous immunoglobulins as first-line treatment in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a pilot study.

Johan Lim, Filip Eftimov, Camiel Verhamme, Esther Brusse, Jessica E Hoogendijk, Christiaan G J Saris, Joost Raaphorst, Rob J De Haan, Ivo N van Schaik, Eleonora Aronica and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05832034 (Treatment With add-on IVIg in Myositis Early In the diSease Course May be sUperior to Steroids Alone for Reaching CLinical improvemEnt), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05832034 phase2 / phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Treatment With add-on IVIg in Myositis Early In the diSease Course May be sUperior to Steroids Alone for Reaching CLinical improvemEnt

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2021 to 2026Enrolled44ConditionsInflammatory Myopathy, Idiopathic, Dermatomyositis, Antisynthetase Syndrome, Immune-Mediated Necrotizing MyopathyArmsImmune Globulin Intravenous (Human), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Emerging therapies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathies: Current Landscape.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Antibody Therapies in Autoimmune Inflammatory Myopathies: Promising Treatment Options.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Johan LimDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Filip EftimovDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Camiel VerhammeDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther BrusseDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus UMC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jessica E HoogendijkDepartment of Neurology, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christiaan G J SarisDepartment of Neurology, Radboud UMC, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joost RaaphorstDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob J De HaanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivo N van SchaikDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eleonora AronicaDepartment of (Neuro)Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marianne de VisserDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anneke J van der KooiDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe explored efficacy and safety of IVIg as first-line treatment in patients with an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

methodsIn this investigator-initiated phase 2 open-label study, we included 20 adults with a newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, and a disease duration of less than 9 months. Patients with IBM and prior use of immunosuppressants were excluded. The standard treatment regimen consisted of IVIg (Privigen) monotherapy for 9 weeks: a loading dose (2 g/kg body weight) and two subsequent maintenance doses (1 g/kg body weight) with a 3-week interval. The primary outcome was the number of patients with at least moderate improvement on the 2016 ACR/EULAR Total Improvement Score. Secondary outcomes included time to improvement, the number of patients requiring rescue medication and serious adverse events.

resultsWe included patients with DM (n = 9), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (n = 6), non-specific myositis/overlap myositis (n = 4) and anti-synthetase syndrome (n = 1). One patient was excluded from analyses because of minimal weakness resulting in a ceiling effect. Eight patients (8/19 = 42.0%; Clopper-Pearson 95% CI: 19.6, 64.6) had at least moderate improvement by 9 weeks. Of these, six reached improvement by 3 weeks. Seven patients required rescue medication due to insufficient efficacy and prematurely ended the study. Three serious adverse events occurred, of which one was pulmonary embolism.

conclusionFirst-line IVIg monotherapy led to at least moderate improvement in nearly half of patients with a fast clinical response in the majority of responders.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register identifier, NTR6160.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCreatine KinaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFolliculitisHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMuscle WeaknessMyositisPilot ProjectsPulmonary EmbolismCreatine KinaseImmunoglobulins, Intravenousimmunotherapymyositis and muscle disease

Identifiers

PMID33099648
PMCPMC8023983
OpenAlexW3093829239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.