ArticleBMJ open2020
Study protocol: a multicentre, prospective, phase II trial of isotoxic hypofractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03606239 (A Phase II Open-Label Multi-center Trial of Isotoxic Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Open-Label Multi-center Trial of Isotoxic Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning enhances precision diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: future prospects.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy integrated in a total multimodal neoadjuvant strategy for the treatment of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionConcurrent chemoradiotherapy with conventional fractionation has been acknowledged as one of the standard treatments for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy is far from enough for local tumour control. Due to this fact, hypofractionated radiotherapy can shorten the total treatment duration, partially counteract the accelerated repopulation of tumour cells and deliver a higher biological effective dose, it has been increasingly used for NSCLC. In theory, concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy can result in an enhanced curative effect. To date, the vast majority of radiotherapy prescriptions assign a uniform radiotherapy dose to all patients. However this kind of uniform radiotherapy prescription may lead to two consequences: excess damage to normal tissues for large tumours and insufficient dose for small tumours. Our study aims to evaluate whether delivering individualised radiotherapy dose is feasible using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our study of individualised radiotherapy is a multicenter phase II trial. From April 2019, a total of 30 patients from three Chinese centres, with a proven histological or cytological diagnosis of inoperable NSCLC, will be recruited. The dose of radiation will be increased until one or more of the organs at risk tolerance or the maximum dose of 69 Gy is reached. The primary end point is feasibility, with response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival as secondary end points. The concurrent chemotherapy regimen will be docetaxel plus lobaplatin. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by medical ethics committees from three research centres. The trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.The trial results will be disseminated through academic conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03606239.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.