Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33099489›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Implementation of national antenatal hypertension guidelines: a multicentre multiple methods study.

Rebecca Whybrow, Louise Webster, Joanna Girling, Heather Brown, Hannah Wilson, Jane Sandall, Lucy Chappell

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca WhybrowWomen and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK rebecca.whybrow@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7484-1492
Louise WebsterWomen and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Joanna GirlingWomen's Health Service, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Heather BrownMaternity, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
Hannah WilsonWomen and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Jane SandallWomen and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Lucy ChappellWomen and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-2014-05-019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the implementation of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence antenatal hypertension guidelines, to identify strategies to reduce incidences of severe hypertension and associated maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.

methodsWe used a multiple method multisite approach to establish implementation of guidelines and the associated barriers and facilitators. We used a national survey of healthcare professionals (n=97), case notes review (n=55) and structured observations (n=42) to assess implementation. The barriers and facilitators to implementation were identified from semistructured qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals (n=13) and pregnant women (n=18) using inductive thematic analysis. The findings were integrated and evaluated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. SETTING AND

participantsPregnant women with chronic hypertension and their principal carers (obstetricians, midwives and physicians), at three National Health Service hospital trusts with different models of care.

resultsWe found severe hypertension to be prevalent (46% of case notes reviewed) and target blood pressure practices to be suboptimal (56% of women had an antenatal blood pressure target documented). Women were infrequently given information (52%) or offered choice (19%) regarding antihypertensives. Women (14/18) reported internal conflict in taking antihypertensives and non-adherence was prevalent (8/18). Women who were concordant with treatment recommendations described having mutual trust with professionals mediated through appropriate information, side effect management and involvement in decision making. Professionals reported needing updates and tools for target blood pressure setting and shared decision making underpinned by antihypertensive safety and effectiveness research.

conclusionsWomen's non-adherence to antihypertensives is higher than anticipated. Suboptimal information provision around treatment, choice of antihypertensives and target setting practices by healthcare professionals may be contributory. Understanding the reasons for non-adherence will inform education and decision-making strategies needed to address both clinician and women's behaviour. Further research into the effectiveness and long-term safety of common antihypertensives is also required.

Indexed as

HypertensionMidwiferyFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleState Medicinehypertensionmaternal medicineobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID33099489
PMCPMC7590365
OpenAlexW3093980999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.