ReviewThe journal of investigative dermatology. Symposium proceedings2020
An Imperative Need for Further Genetic Studies of Alopecia Areata.
Review in The journal of investigative dermatology. Symposium proceedings, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Polygenic Architecture of Human Diseases Affecting the Hair Follicle.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2026Review
- Inborn Errors of Immunity Contribute to the Burden of Skin Disease and Create Opportunities for Improving the Practice of Dermatology.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2024Article
- Recent advances in the genetics of alopecia areata.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023Article
- Genetic Association between Interleukin Genes and Alopecia Areata in Jordanian Patients.Oman medical journal · 2022Article
- Clinical translation of hidradenitis suppurativa genetic studies requires global collaboration.The British journal of dermatology · 2022Article
- Alopecia Areata: an Update on Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Human genetic studies of diseases that are multifactorial and prevalent have generated a wealth of knowledge about the genetic architecture of chronic diseases. Generalizable attributes are shaping the development of models to explain how the human genome influences our health and can be leveraged to improve it. Importantly, both rare and common genetic variants contribute to disease risk and provide complementary information. Although initial genetic studies of alopecia areata have yielded insight with high clinical impact, there remains a number of important unanswered questions pertaining to disease biology and patient care that could be addressed by further genetic investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.