Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33099322›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Effect of family doctor contract services on patient perceived quality of primary care in southern China.

Shanshan Feng, Aiyun Cheng, Zhenni Luo, Yao Xiao, Luwen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shanshan FengSchool of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Xinzao Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 5111436, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. Fengshsh@126.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6271-0188
Aiyun ChengSchool of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Xinzao Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 5111436, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhenni LuoSchool of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Xinzao Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 5111436, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yao XiaoSchool of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Xinzao Town, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 5111436, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Luwen ZhangSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, South Shatai Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Guangdong Medical Research Foundation C2015033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily doctor contract service is an important service item in China's primary care reform. This research was designed to evaluate the impact of the provision of family doctor contract services on the patient-perceived quality of primary care, and therefore give evidence-based policy suggestions.

methodsThis cross-sectional study of family doctor contract service policy was conducted in three pilot cities in the Pearl River Delta, South China, using a multistage stratified sampling method. The validated Primary Care Assessment Tool-Adult Edition (PCAT-AS) was used to measure the quality of primary care services. PCAT-AS assesses each of the unique characteristics of primary care including first contact, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination, family-centeredness, community orientation, culture orientation. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews held from July to November, 2015. Covariate analysis and multivariate Linear Regression were adopted to explore the effect of contract on the quality of primary care by controlling for the socio-demographic status and health care service utilization factors.

resultsA total of 828 valid questionnaires were collected. Among the interviewees, 453 patients signed the contract (54.7%) and 375 did not (45.3%). Multivariate linear regression showed that contracted patients reported higher scores in dimensions of PCAT total score (β = - 8.98, P < 0.000), first contact-utilization(β = - 0.71,P < 0.001), first contact-accessibility(β = - 1.49, P < 0.001), continuity (β = 1.27, P < 0.001), coordination (referral) (β = - 1.42, P < 0.001), comprehensiveness (utilization) (β = - 1.70, P < 0.001), comprehensiveness (provision) (β = - 0.99, P < 0.001),family-centeredness(β = - 0.52, P < 0.01), community orientation(β = - 1.78, P < 0.001), than un- contracted after controlling socio-demographic and service utilization factors. There were no statistically significant differences in the dimensions of coordination (information system) (β = - 0.25, P = 0.137) and culture orientation (β = - 0.264, P = 0.056) between the two both groups.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the pilot implementation of family doctor contract services has significantly improved patients' perceived primary care quality in the pilot cities, and could help solve the quality problem of primary care. It needs further promotion across the province.

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyPrimary Health CareAdultChinaContract ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesFamily doctor contract servicesPrimary carePrimary care assessment tool (PCAT)Quality

Identifiers

PMID33099322
PMCPMC7585687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.